首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Telephone Follow-Up in Primary Care: Can Interactive Voice Response Calls Work?
【2h】

Telephone Follow-Up in Primary Care: Can Interactive Voice Response Calls Work?

机译:电话在初级保健中的跟进:可以交互式语音响应呼叫工作吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Follow-up calls after ambulatory visits are not routinely done, yet they can potentially detect and mitigate unresolved problems. Automated calls via an Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) are an innovative way to conduct follow-up, but patients’ attitudes toward follow-up calls are unknown. This study assessed 1) patient perceptions about follow-up calls after visits; 2) differences in perceptions between human and IVRS calls; and 3) association between follow-up calls and patient satisfaction with care. Post-visit follow-up calls in two ambulatory care setting were done in two phases. Phase 1 used a human caller and phase 2 used IVRS. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were completed after each phase. Results showed that 88% of patients favor the idea of the calls and those receiving them found them helpful. There were no differences in attitudes between patients receiving calls from clinic staff or from an IVRS. Patients receiving calls had higher patient satisfaction scores than those not called. Conclusion: Patients value follow-up calls and they are associated with patient satisfaction with care. IVRS is an innovative way to conduct post-visit follow-up.
机译:例行探访后的后续呼叫通常不会进行,但是它们可以潜在地发现并缓解未解决的问题。通过交互式语音响应系统(IVRS)进行自动呼叫是进行随访的一种创新方式,但是患者对随访电话的态度尚不清楚。这项研究评估了1)患者对就诊后随访电话的看法; 2)人与IVRS呼叫之间的感知差异; 3)随访电话与患者对护理的满意度之间的关联。在两个非卧床护理环境中分两次进行了随访。第一阶段使用人工呼叫者,第二阶段使用IVRS。在每个阶段后完成患者满意度调查表。结果表明,有88%的患者赞成致电的想法,而接听电话的人认为它们很有帮助。接受诊所工作人员或IVRS呼叫的患者之间的态度没有差异。接听电话的患者的满意度比未接听电话的患者高。结论:患者重视随访电话,并且与患者的护理满意度相关。 IVRS是进行随访的一种创新方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号