首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Practices and Policies of Clinical Exome Sequencing Providers: Analysis and Implications
【2h】

Practices and Policies of Clinical Exome Sequencing Providers: Analysis and Implications

机译:临床外显子组测序提供者的实践和政策:分析与启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Exome and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) offer potential advantages over traditional approaches to diagnostic genetic testing. Consequently, use of ES/WGS in clinical settings is rapidly becoming commonplace. Yet there are myriad moral, ethical, and perhaps legal implications attached to the use of ES and health care professionals and institutions will need to consider these implications in the context of the varied practices and policies of ES service providers. We developed “core elements” of content and procedures for informed consent, data sharing, and results management and a quantitative scale to assess the extent to which research protocols met the standards established by these core elements. We then used these tools to evaluate the practices and policies of each of the 6 U.S. CLIA-certified labs offering clinical ES. Approaches toward informed consent, data sharing, and results return vary widely among ES providers as do the overall potential merits and disadvantages of each, and more importantly, the balance between the two.
机译:外显子组和全基因组测序(ES / WGS)与传统的诊断基因测试方法相比具有潜在的优势。因此,在临床环境中使用ES / WGS迅速变得司空见惯。但是,使用ES涉及无数的道德,道德和法律影响,因此,在ES服务提供商的不同做法和政策的背景下,医疗专业人员和机构需要考虑这些影响。我们开发了知情同意书,数据共享和结果管理的内容和程序的“核心要素”,以及量化规模,以评估研究方案达到这些核心要素所建立的标准的程度。然后,我们使用这些工具评估了6家获得美国CLIA认证的提供临床ES的实验室的做法和政策。 ES提供者之间达成知情同意,数据共享和结果返回的方法差异很大,每个提供者的整体潜在优点和缺点,更重要的是,两者之间的平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号