首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >COMPARISON OF WHO CLASSIFICATIONS (2004 2010) THE HOCHWALD GRADING SYSTEM AJCC AND ENETS STAGING SYSTEMS IN PREDICTING PROGNOSIS IN LOCOREGIONAL WELL-DIFFERENTIATED PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS
【2h】

COMPARISON OF WHO CLASSIFICATIONS (2004 2010) THE HOCHWALD GRADING SYSTEM AJCC AND ENETS STAGING SYSTEMS IN PREDICTING PROGNOSIS IN LOCOREGIONAL WELL-DIFFERENTIATED PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS

机译:WHO分类(2004年2010年)HOCHWALD分级系统AJCC和Enets分期系统在局部差异显着的胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤预测中的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is difficult to predict prognosis in patients with locoregional well-differentiated (WD) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET). We aimed to examine commonly used stratification systems (WHO 2004 and 2010 classifications, AJCC and ENETS staging, and the Hochwald grading system) for their power in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) in these patients. Seventy-five such patients (mean age 56 years, mean follow-up 79 months) that underwent resection with sufficient tissue material and follow up data were studied. RFS was correlated with variable clinicopathologic features and stratified with above-mentioned systems. Concordance-index (CI) was then calculated. With the WHO 2004 classification, 16, 35, and 24 PanNETs were classified as benign behavior, uncertain behavior, and well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma, respectively. By the WHO 2010 classification, 26, 41, and 8 tumors were grade 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Using the Hochwald system, 47 were low grade and 28 were intermediate grade. The AJCC staging information was complete for 62 patients (13 had lymph node status as Nx) and included: stage IA (19/62), IB (10/62), IIA (10/62), and IIB (23/62). The ENETS staging information was stage I (16/62), IIa (8/62), IIb (14/62), IIIa (0/62), and IIIb (24/62). The average Ki-67-proliferation index (PI) was 8.1%. Factors that predicted RFS included tumor size, nodal metastasis, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, necrosis, mitosis, and Ki-67 PI (all p<0.01). The CI for each system was: 0.6361 for WHO 2004, 0.6735 for WHO 2010, 0.6495 for AJCC staging, 0.6642 for ENETS staging, and 0.6851 for Hochwald grading system. When these systems were analyzed in conjunction with various additional important pathologic features, combination of Hochwald grading system and Ki-67 PI achieved the highest CI (0.7946). Therefore, while all these systems predict RFS well in locoregional WD PanNETs, the Hochwald grading systems achieves the highest predictive ability. Further predictive power can be achieved by combining the Hochwald grading system and Ki-67 PI.
机译:局部区域高分化(WD)胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PanNET)患者的预后难以预测。我们旨在检查常用的分层系统(WHO 2004和2010分类,AJCC和ENETS分期以及Hochwald分级系统)在预测这些患者无复发生存(RFS)方面的作用。研究了75例接受了足够组织材料切除的患者(平均年龄56岁,平均随访79个月),并随访了数据。 RFS与可变的临床病理特征相关,并与上述系统分层。然后计算一致性指数(CI)。根据WHO 2004分类标准,分别将16、35和24个PanNETs分为良性行为,不确定行为和高分化内分泌癌。根据WHO 2010分类,分别有26、41和8个肿瘤为1、2和3级。使用Hochwald系统,低等级为47,中等级为28。完整的AJCC分期信息适用于62位患者(13位淋巴结状态为Nx),包括IA期(19/62),IB(10/62),IIA(10/62)和IIB(23/62) 。 ENETS分期信息为阶段I(16/62),IIa(8/62),IIb(14/62),IIIa(0/62)和IIIb(24/62)。平均Ki-67增殖指数(PI)为8.1%。预测RFS的因素包括肿瘤大小,淋巴结转移,血管浸润,神经周浸润,坏死,有丝分裂和Ki-67 PI(所有p <0.01)。每个系统的CI为:WHO 2004年为0.6361,WHO 2010年为0.6735,AJCC分期为0.6495,ENETS分期为0.6642,Hochwald分级系统为0.6851。当结合各种其他重要病理特征对这些系统进行分析时,Hochwald分级系统和Ki-67 PI的组合获得最高CI(0.7946)。因此,尽管所有这些系统在局部WD PanNETs中都能很好地预测RFS,但Hochwald分级系统具有最高的预测能力。通过结合使用Hochwald分级系统和Ki-67 PI,可以进一步提高预测能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号