首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >An In Vitro evaluation of disinfection protocols used for needleless connectors of central venous catheters
【2h】

An In Vitro evaluation of disinfection protocols used for needleless connectors of central venous catheters

机译:用于中央静脉导管无针连接器的消毒协议的体外评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A repeatable and sensitive method to evaluate the effect of three antiseptics and two disinfection techniques on viable micro-organisms on luer-activated catheter needleless connectors (NCs) was developed. NCs were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis or Klebsiella pneumoniae and disinfected with 3·15% chlorhexidine gluconate + 70% isopropanol (CGI), 70% isopropanol (IPA) or 10% PVP povidone-iodine (PI) antiseptic pads using: (i) scrubbing the NC septum and threaded external surfaces or (ii) wiping only the surface of the septum. Treatments were also evaluated against NCs pretreated with human serum and exposed for 18 h to Staph. epidermidis prior to testing. Viable cells were quantified by plate count. The method for inoculation and recovery of luminal micro-organisms was repeatable (SD, 0·31; n = 28). IPA disinfection provided an approximate 3 log10 CFU reduction; CGI and PI provided 3–4 log10 reductions. PI and CGI were more effective than IPA (P < 0·05), but differences between CGI and PI were not significant for either disinfection method. IPA, but not CGI and PI was also less effective (P < 0·05) against NCs inoculated with Kl. pneumoniae than Staph. epidermidis. Pretreatment with serum and prolonged Staph. epidermidis inoculation removed the advantage seen with CGI and PI; log10 reductions were 1·80, 1·73 and 2·50 for CGI, PI and IPA, respectively. PI or CGI may be more effective than IPA for NC disinfection but effectiveness may be reduced on NCs contaminated with blood or serum.
机译:开发了一种可重复性和灵敏的方法,用于评估三种抗菌剂和两种消毒技术对鲁尔激活的导管无针连接器(NCs)上的活微生物的影响。 NCs接种表皮葡萄球菌或肺炎克雷伯菌,并用3·15%葡萄糖酸氯己定+ 70%异丙醇(CGI),70%异丙醇(IPA)或10%PVP聚维酮-碘(PI)消毒垫消毒,方法是:(i)擦洗NC隔垫和螺纹外表面,或者(ii)仅擦拭隔垫表面。还针对用人血清预处理并暴露于Staph 18 h的NC评估了治疗效果。表皮之前进行测试。通过板计数定量活细胞。腔内微生物的接种和恢复方法是可重复的(SD,0·31; n = 28)。 IPA消毒可减少约3 log10 CFU; CGI和PI提供了3-4 log10的减少。 PI和CGI比IPA更有效(P <0·05),但是CGI和PI之间的差异在两种消毒方法中均不显着。对于接种K1的NCs,IPA无效,但CGI和PI无效(P <0·05)。肺炎比葡萄球菌。表皮用血清和延长的葡萄球菌预处理。上皮接种消除了CGI和PI的优势; CGI,PI和IPA的log10减少分别为1·80、1·73和2·50。对于NC消毒,PI或CGI可能比IPA更有效,但对被血液或血清污染的NC可能会降低有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号