首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Non-Contrast Enhanced 3D SSFP MRA of the Renal Allograft Vasculature: A Comparison Between Radial Linear Combination and Cartesian Inflow-Weighted Acquisitions
【2h】

Non-Contrast Enhanced 3D SSFP MRA of the Renal Allograft Vasculature: A Comparison Between Radial Linear Combination and Cartesian Inflow-Weighted Acquisitions

机译:肾脏同种异体移植血管的非对比增强型3D SSFP MRA:径向线性组合与笛卡尔流入加权采集之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Renal transplant patients often require imaging to ensure appropriate graft placement, to assess integrity of transplant vessel anastomosis and to evaluate for stenosis that can be a cause of graft failure. Because there is risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in the setting of renal insufficiency, the use of non-contrast MRA in these patients is helpful. In this study, the ability of two non-contrast MRA methods – 3D radial linear combination balanced SSFP (VIPR-SSFP) and inflow-weighted Cartesian SSFP (IFIR) – to visualize the transplant renal vessels is compared. Twenty-one renal transplant patients were scanned using the VIPR-SSFP and IFIR sequences. Diagnostic efficacy of the sequences was scored using a four point Likert scale according to the following criteria: overall image quality, fat suppression, and arterial / venous visualization quality. Average scores for each criterion were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Besides significantly improved venous visualization, the VIPR-SSFP sequence provided significantly improved fat suppression quality (p <0.03) compared to IFIR. Additionally, VIPR-SSFP identified several pathologies such as renal arterial pseudoaneurysm that were not visible on the IFIR images. However, IFIR afforded superior quality of arterial visualization (p<0.005). These two methods of non-contrast MR imaging each have significant strengths and are complementary to each other in evaluating the vasculature of renal allografts.
机译:肾移植患者通常需要进行影像检查,以确保适当的移植物放置,评估移植血管吻合的完整性以及评估可能导致移植失败的狭窄。由于在肾功能不全的情况下存在肾源性系统性纤维化的风险,因此在这些患者中使用非对比MRA是有帮助的。在这项研究中,比较了两种非对比MRA方法(3D径向线性组合平衡SSFP(VIPR-SSFP)和流入加权笛卡尔SSFP(IFIR))可视化移植肾血管的能力。使用VIPR-SSFP和IFIR序列对21名肾移植患者进行了扫描。根据以下标准,使用四点李克特量表对序列的诊断功效进行评分:整体图像质量,脂肪抑制和动脉/静脉可视化质量。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较每个标准的平均分数。与IFIR相比,除了显着改善静脉可视化外,VIPR-SSFP序列还提供了显着改善的脂肪抑制质量(p <0.03)。此外,VIPR-SSFP还确定了几种病状,例如在IFIR图像上不可见的肾动脉假性动脉瘤。但是,IFIR提供了卓越的动脉可视化质量(p <0.005)。这两种非对比MR成像方法均具有显着优势,并且在评估同种异体肾的脉管系统方面彼此互补。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号