首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Caring across Boundaries versus Keeping Boundaries Intact: Links between Moral Values and Interpersonal Orientations
【2h】

Caring across Boundaries versus Keeping Boundaries Intact: Links between Moral Values and Interpersonal Orientations

机译:关爱边界与保持边界完整:道德价值观与人际取向之间的联系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prior work has established robust diversity in the extent to which different moral values are endorsed. Some people focus on values related to caring and fairness, whereas others assign additional moral weight to ingroup loyalty, respect for authority and established hierarchies, and purity concerns. Five studies explore associations between endorsement of distinct moral values and a suite of interpersonal orientations: Machiavellianism, prosocial resource distribution, Social Dominance Orientation, and reported likelihood of helping and not helping kin and close friends versus acquaintances and neighbors. We found that Machiavellianism (Studies 1, 3, 4, 5) (e.g., amorality, controlling and status-seeking behaviors) and Social Dominance Orientation (Study 4) were negatively associated with caring values, and positively associated with valuation of authority. Those higher in caring values were more likely to choose prosocial resource distributions (Studies 2, 3, 4) and to report reduced likelihood of failing to help kin/close friends or acquaintances (Study 4). Finally, greater likelihood of helping acquaintances was positively associated with all moral values tested except authority values (Study 4). The current work offers a novel approach to characterizing moral values and reveals a striking divergence between two kinds of moral values in particular: caring values and authority values. Caring values were positively linked with prosociality and negatively associated with Machiavellianism, whereas authority values were positively associated with Machiavellianism and Social Dominance Orientation.
机译:先前的工作在认可不同道德价值观的程度上建立了强大的多样性。有些人关注与关怀和公平相关的价值观,而另一些人则赋予团体忠诚度,对权威和既定等级的尊重以及对纯正的关注的道德上的额外重视。五项研究探索了对不同道德价值观的认可与一系列人际取向之间的联系:马基雅维主义,亲社会资源分配,社会优势取向,并报道了帮助或不帮助亲戚和熟人与熟人和邻居的可能性。我们发现马基雅维主义(研究1,3,4,5)(例如,道德,控制和寻求身份的行为)和社会支配取向(研究4)与关怀价值负相关,与权威评估正相关。那些具有较高关怀价值的人更有可能选择亲社会资源的分布(研究2、3、4),并报告减少了无法帮助亲戚/朋友或熟人的可能性(研究4)。最后,帮助熟人的更大可能性与除权威价值观以外的所有道德价值观均呈正相关(研究4)。当前的工作提供了一种表征道德价值观的新颖方法,并揭示了两种道德价值观之间的显着差异,尤其是关怀价值观和权威价值观。关怀价值观与亲社会关系正相关,与马基雅维利主义则负相关,而权威价值与马基雅维利主义和社会主导地位正相关。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Laura Niemi; Liane Young;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(8),12
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e81605
  • 总页数 12
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号