首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Rewriting abortion: deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal
【2h】

Rewriting abortion: deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal

机译:重写堕胎:在塞内加尔的一项禁令中在管辖权谈判中部署医疗记录

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Boundary work refers to the strategies deployed by professionals in the arenas of the public, the law and the workplace to define and defend jurisdictional authority. Little attention has been directed to the role of documents in negotiating professional claims. While boundary work over induced abortion has been extensively documented, few studies have examined jurisdictional disputes over the treatment of abortion complications, or post-abortion care (PAC). This study explores how medical providers deploy medical records in boundary work over the treatment of complications of spontaneous and induced abortion in Senegal, where induced abortion is prohibited under any circumstance. Findings are based on an institutional ethnography of Senegal’s national PAC program over a period of 13 months between 2010 and 2011. Data collection methods included in-depth interviews with 36 health care professionals, observation of PAC services at three hospitals, a review of abortion records at each hospital, and a case review of illegal abortions prosecuted by the state. Findings show that health providers produce a particular account of the type of abortion treated through a series of practices such as the patient interview and the clinical exam. Providers obscure induced abortion in medical documents in three ways: the use of terminology that does not differentiate between induced and spontaneous abortion in PAC registers, the omission of data on the type of abortion altogether in PAC registers, and reporting the total number but not the type of abortions treated in hospital data transmitted to state health authorities. The obscuration of suspected induced abortion in the record permits providers to circumvent police inquiry at the hospital. PAC has been implemented in nearly 50 countries worldwide. This study demonstrates the need for additional research on how medical professionals negotiate conflicting medical and legal obligations in the daily practice of treating abortion complications.
机译:边界工作是指专业人员在公共场所,法律和工作场所为定义和捍卫管辖权而采用的策略。人们很少关注文件在谈判专业索赔中的作用。尽管关于人工流产的边界工作已有大量文献记载,但很少有研究检查有关人工流产并发症或人工流产后护理(PAC)的管辖权争议。这项研究探讨了医疗服务提供者如何在塞内加尔自发性和人工流产并发症的治疗中在边界工作中部署医疗记录,塞内加尔在任何情况下都禁止人工流产。调查结果基于塞内加尔2010年至2011年13个月内塞内加尔国家PAC计划的民族志。数据收集方法包括与36位医疗保健专业人员进行深入访谈,对三家医院的PAC服务进行观察,对堕胎记录进行回顾在每家医院,以及对由国家起诉的非法堕胎的案例审查。调查结果表明,卫生保健提供者通过一系列实践(例如患者访谈和临床检查)对治疗的流产类型做出了特殊说明。提供者通过三种方式掩盖医疗文件中的人工流产:使用不区分PAC登记册中的人工流产和自然流产的术语,PAC登记册中完全省略流产类型的数据,以及报告总数,但不报告传送给州卫生部门的医院数据中处理的堕胎类型。记录中疑似人工流产的掩盖使提供者可以绕开警察在医院的询问。 PAC已在全球近50个国家/地区实施。这项研究表明,有必要对医疗专业人员在处理流产并发症的日常实践中如何协商相互矛盾的医疗和法律义务进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号