首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Rewriting abortion: Deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal
【24h】

Rewriting abortion: Deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal

机译:重写堕胎:在塞内加尔禁止实践中向司法谈判部署医疗记录

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Boundary work refers to the strategies deployed by professionals in the arenas of the public, the law and the workplace to define and defend jurisdictional authority. Little attention has been directed to the role of documents in negotiating professional claims. While boundary work over induced abortion has been extensively documented, few studies have examined jurisdictional disputes over the treatment of abortion complications, or post-abortion care (PAC). This study explores how medical providers deploy medical records in boundary work over the treatment of complications of spontaneous and induced abortion in Senegal, where induced abortion is prohibited under any circumstance. Findings are based on an institutional ethnography of Senegal's national PAC program over a period of 13 months between 2010 and 2011. Data collection methods included in-depth interviews with 36 health care professionals, observation of PAC services at three hospitals, a review of abortion records at each hospital, and a case review of illegal abortions prosecuted by the state. Findings show that health providers produce a particular account of the type of abortion treated through a series of practices such as the patient interview and the clinical exam. Providers obscure induced abortion in medical documents in three ways: the use of terminology that does not differentiate between induced and spontaneous abortion in PAC registers, the omission of data on the type of abortion altogether in PAC registers, and reporting the total number but not the type of abortions treated in hospital data transmitted to state health authorities. The obscuration of suspected induced abortion in the record permits providers to circumvent police inquiry at the hospital. PAC has been implemented in approximately 50 countries worldwide. This study demonstrates the need for additional research on how medical professionals negotiate conflicting medical and legal obligations in the daily practice of treating abortion complications.
机译:边界的工作是指在政府,法律和工作场所的界定和捍卫管辖权限进行的专业领域部署的策略。很少有人注意指向的文件在谈判专业索赔的作用。虽然在人工流产界工作已得到广泛证明,但很少有研究探讨过人工流产的并发症,或流产后保健(PAC)的治疗管辖权争议。本研究探讨医疗机构如何部署了其中人工流产是在任何情况下禁止在塞内加尔,自发和人工流产的并发症的治疗边界工作的医疗记录。发现是基于对塞内加尔的国家PAC计划在包括深入访谈36健康护理专业人员,在三家医院的PAC服务的观察,流产记录的审查期限的2010年和2011年的数据收集方法在13个月的体制人类学在各医院,并经国家起诉非法堕胎的情况下审查。调查结果表明,医疗服务提供者产生特定帐户通过一系列的做法处理流产的类型,如病人访谈和临床考试。供应商掩盖在医疗文件人工流产的方法有三种:术语的使用不引起自然流产之间的PAC寄存器区分,数据的遗漏堕胎的类型完全在PAC登记和报告的总数,但不输入传送到国家卫生部门医院治疗数据流产。疑似人工流产记录遮拦允许供应商在医院的回避警方的询问。 PAC已经在约50个国家已经实现全球。这项研究表明,在专业医务人员协商如何治疗流产并发症的日常实践冲突的医疗和法律义务需要进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号