首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Speed and accuracy of dyslexic versus typical word recognition: an eye-movement investigation
【2h】

Speed and accuracy of dyslexic versus typical word recognition: an eye-movement investigation

机译:阅读困难与典型单词识别的速度和准确性:眼动研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Developmental dyslexia is often characterized by a dual deficit in both word recognition accuracy and general processing speed. While previous research into dyslexic word recognition may have suffered from speed-accuracy trade-off, the present study employed a novel eye-tracking task that is less prone to such confounds. Participants (10 dyslexics and 12 controls) were asked to look at real word stimuli, and to ignore simultaneously presented non-word stimuli, while their eye-movements were recorded. Improvements in word recognition accuracy over time were modeled in terms of a continuous non-linear function. The words' rhyme consistency and the non-words' lexicality (unpronounceable, pronounceable, pseudohomophone) were manipulated within-subjects. Speed-related measures derived from the model fits confirmed generally slower processing in dyslexics, and showed a rhyme consistency effect in both dyslexics and controls. In terms of overall error rate, dyslexics (but not controls) performed less accurately on rhyme-inconsistent words, suggesting a representational deficit for such words in dyslexics. Interestingly, neither group showed a pseudohomophone effect in speed or accuracy, which might call the task-independent pervasiveness of this effect into question. The present results illustrate the importance of distinguishing between speed- vs. accuracy-related effects for our understanding of dyslexic word recognition.
机译:发展性阅读障碍通常以单词识别准确性和总体处理速度双重缺陷为特征。虽然以前对阅读困难的单词识别的研究可能会受到速度准确性的折衷的影响,但本研究采用了一种新颖的眼动追踪任务,该任务不太容易引起此类混淆。要求参与者(10个阅读障碍者和12个对照组)观察真实的单词刺激,并忽略同时呈现的非单词刺激,同时记录他们的眼动。随着时间的流逝,单词识别准确性的提高是根据连续非线性函数建模的。单词的韵律一致性和非单词的词汇性(不可发音,可发音,伪谐音)都在对象内进行了操作。从模型拟合中得出的与速度相关的测量值通常证实了阅读障碍者的处理速度较慢,并且在阅读障碍者和对照者中均显示了韵律一致性效应。就总体错误率而言,阅读困难(但不是对照)对韵律不一致的单词的准确度较低,这表明阅读困难时此类单词的代表性不足。有趣的是,两个小组都没有在速度或准确性上表现出伪同声效应,这可能使这种效应的与任务无关的普遍性受到质疑。目前的结果说明了区分速度与准确性相关的影响对于我们理解阅读障碍单词识别的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号