首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Differences in the Predictors of Reading Comprehension in First Graders from Low Socio-Economic Status Families with Either Good or Poor Decoding Skills
【2h】

Differences in the Predictors of Reading Comprehension in First Graders from Low Socio-Economic Status Families with Either Good or Poor Decoding Skills

机译:社会经济地位低解码能力好或差的一年级学生阅读理解预测指标的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Based on the assumption that good decoding skills constitute a bootstrapping mechanism for reading comprehension, the present study investigated the relative contribution of the former skill to the latter compared to that of three other predictors of reading comprehension (listening comprehension, vocabulary and phonemic awareness) in 392 French-speaking first graders from low SES families. This large sample was split into three groups according to their level of decoding skills assessed by pseudoword reading. Using a cutoff of 1 SD above or below the mean of the entire population, there were 63 good decoders, 267 average decoders and 62 poor decoders. 58% of the variance in reading comprehension was explained by our four predictors, with decoding skills proving to be the best predictor (12.1%, 7.3% for listening comprehension, 4.6% for vocabulary and 3.3% for phonemic awareness). Interaction between group versus decoding skills, listening comprehension and phonemic awareness accounted for significant additional variance (3.6%, 1.1% and 1.0%, respectively). The effects on reading comprehension of decoding skills and phonemic awareness were higher in poor and average decoders than in good decoders whereas listening comprehension accounted for more variance in good and average decoders than in poor decoders. Furthermore, the percentage of children with impaired reading comprehension skills was higher in the group of poor decoders (55%) than in the two other groups (average decoders: 7%; good decoders: 0%) and only 6 children (1.5%) had impaired reading comprehension skills with unimpaired decoding skills, listening comprehension or vocabulary. These results challenge the outcomes of studies on “poor comprehenders” by showing that, at least in first grade, poor reading comprehension is strongly linked to the level of decoding skills.
机译:基于良好的解码技能构成阅读理解的自举机制的假设,本研究调查了前者技能对后者的相对贡献,与其他三种阅读理解预测因子(听理解,词汇和音素意识)相比。来自低SES家庭的392年说法语的一年级学生。根据通过伪单词阅读评估的解码技能水平,将这个大样本分为三组。使用高于或低于整个总体平均值的1 SD截止值,可以得到63个好的解码器,267个平均解码器和62个差的解码器。我们的四个预测因子解释了阅读理解差异的58%,其中解码能力被证明是最好的预测因子(12.1%,听力理解为7.3%,词汇为4.6%,音素为3.3%)。小组与解码技能,听力理解和音素意识之间的相互作用造成了显着的额外差异(分别为3.6%,1.1%和1.0%)。较差的和普通的解码器对解码技能和音素意识的阅读理解的影响要比良好的解码器要高,而对良好和普通的解码器的收听理解所占的差异要比较差的解码器大。此外,阅读能力较差的儿童组中,解码器质量较差的组(55%)比其他两组(平均解码器:7%;良好的解码器:0%)高,只有6个孩子(1.5%)阅读能力受损,解码能力,听力理解能力或词汇能力均未受损。这些结果通过证明至少在一年级时阅读能力差与解码能力水平密切相关,从而对“理解能力差”的研究结果提出了挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号