首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern but not emotional empathy predict sensitivity to injustice for others
【2h】

Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern but not emotional empathy predict sensitivity to injustice for others

机译:同情心和正义动机:认知同情心和关注感而不是情感同情心预示着对他人不公的敏感性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Why do people tend to care for upholding principles of justice? This study examined the association between individual differences in the affective, motivational and cognitive components of empathy, sensitivity to justice, and psychopathy in participants (N 265) who were also asked to rate the permissibility of everyday moral situations that pit personal benefit against moral standards of justice. Counter to commonsense, emotional empathy was not associated with sensitivity to injustice for others. Rather, individual differences in cognitive empathy and empathic concern predicted sensitivity to justice for others, as well as the endorsement of moral rules. Psychopathy coldheartedness scores were inversely associated with motivation for justice. Moreover, hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis revealed that self-focused and other-focused orientations toward justice had opposing influences on the permissibility of moral judgments. High scores on psychopathy were associated with less moral condemnation of immoral behavior. Together, these results contribute to a better understanding of the information processing mechanisms underlying justice motivation, and may guide interventions designed to foster justice and moral behavior. In order to promote justice motivation, it may be more effective to encourage perspective taking and reasoning to induce concern for others than emphasizing emotional sharing with the misfortune of others.
机译:人们为什么倾向于维护正义原则?这项研究调查了参与者的情感,动机和认知成分中的个体差异,同情心,正义感和精神病之间的关联(N 265),他们还被要求评估使个人利益与道德标准相抵触的日常道德状况的可容许性正义。与常识相反,情感移情与他人对不公正的敏感性无关。相反,认知共情和共情关注的个体差异预示着对他人正义的敏感性,以及对道德规则的认可。精神病患者的冷漠度得分与寻求正义的动机成反比。此外,等级多元线性回归分析表明,以正义为中心的自我关注和其他关注取向对道德判断的容许性具有相反的影响。精神病得分较高与道德行为对道德行为的谴责较少有关。总之,这些结果有助于更好地理解正义动机背后的信息处理机制,并可能指导旨在促进正义和道德行为的干预措施。为了促进正义的动机,与强调与他人不幸的情感分享相比,鼓励采取观点和推理来引起他人关注可能更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号