首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Views of Swedish Commissioning Parents Relating to the Exploitation Discourse in Using Transnational Surrogacy
【2h】

Views of Swedish Commissioning Parents Relating to the Exploitation Discourse in Using Transnational Surrogacy

机译:瑞典委托父母关于利用跨国代孕的剥削话语的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Transnational surrogacy, when people travel abroad for reproduction with the help of a surrogate mother, is a heavily debated phenomenon. One of the most salient discourses on surrogacy is the one affirming that Westerners, in their quest for having a child, exploit poor women in countries such as India. As surrogacy within the Swedish health care system is not permitted, Swedish commissioning parents have used transnational surrogacy, and the majority has turned to India. This interview study aimed to explore how commissioning parents negotiate the present discourses on surrogacy. Findings from the study suggest that the commissioning parents’ views on using surrogacy are influenced by competing discourses on surrogacy represented by media and surrogacy agencies. The use of this reproductive method resulted, then, in some ambiguity. Although commissioning parents defy the exploitation discourse by referring to what they have learnt about the surrogate mother’s life situation and by pointing at the significant benefits for her, they still had a request for regulation of surrogacy in Sweden, to better protect all parties involved. This study, then, gives a complex view on surrogacy, where the commissioning parents simultaneously argue against the exploitation discourse but at the same time are uncertain if the surrogate mothers are well protected in the surrogacy arrangements. Their responses to the situation endorse the need for regulation both in Sweden and India.
机译:当人们在代孕母亲的帮助下出国繁殖时,跨国代孕是一个备受争议的现象。关于代孕的最突出的论述之一是肯定西方人在寻求生育的过程中,在印度等国家剥削贫穷的妇女。由于不允许在瑞典的医疗保健系统内进行代孕,因此,瑞典的委托父母使用了跨国代孕,并且大多数人转向了印度。这项访谈研究旨在探讨委托父母如何就代孕问题进行讨论。研究发现,委托父母对代孕的看法受媒体和代孕机构代表的关于代孕的竞争性论述的影响。因此,这种生殖方法的使用产生了一些歧义。尽管委托父母不顾剥削话语,只是参考他们所了解的代孕母亲的生活状况并指出给母亲带来的重大利益,但他们仍然要求对瑞典代孕进行监管,以更好地保护有关各方。然后,这项研究对代孕提出了一个复杂的观点,即委托父母同时反对剥削话语,但同时也不确定代孕母亲是否在代孕安排中得到了很好的保护。他们对这种情况的回应表明,瑞典和印度都需要进行监管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号