首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Attending to items in working memory: Evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related
【2h】

Attending to items in working memory: Evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related

机译:参加工作记忆中的项目:刷新和记忆搜索紧密相关的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Refreshing refers to the use of attention to reactivate items in working memory (WM). The current study aims at testing the hypothesis that refreshing is closely related to memory search. The assumption is that refreshing and memory search both rely on a basic covert memory process that quickly retrieves the memory items into the focus of attention, thereby reactivating the information (; ). Consistent with the idea that people use their attention to prevent loss from WM, previous research has shown that increasing the proportion of time during which attention is occupied by concurrent processing, thereby preventing refreshing, results in poorer recall performance in complex span tasks (). Here, we tested whether recall performance is differentially affected by prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search. If memory search and refreshing both rely on retrieval from WM, then prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search should not lead to forgetting because memory items are assumed to be reactivated during memory search, in the same way as they would if that period of time were to be used for refreshing. Consistent with this idea, prolonged attentional capture had a disruptive effect when it was caused by the need to retrieve knowledge from long-term memory but not when it was caused by the need to search through the content of WM. The current results support the idea that refreshing operates through a process of retrieval of information into the focus of attention.
机译:刷新是指注意重新激活工作存储器(WM)中的项目。当前的研究旨在检验刷新与内存搜索紧密相关的假设。假设刷新和内存搜索都依赖于基本的隐式存储过程,该过程可快速将存储项检索到关注的焦点中,从而重新激活信息(;)。与人们用注意力防止WM损失的想法一致,先前的研究表明,增加并发处理占用注意力的时间比例,从而防止刷新,导致复杂跨度任务的召回性能较差()。在这里,我们测试了记忆搜索引起的长时间注意力捕获是否对召回性能有不同的影响。如果内存搜索和刷新都依赖于从WM进行检索,则由内存搜索引起的长时间注意力捕获不应导致遗忘,因为假定内存项目在内存搜索过程中被重新激活,就像在该时间段内用于刷新。与这个想法一致,长时间的注意力捕获是由于需要从长期记忆中检索知识而引起的破坏性效果,而不是由于需要搜索WM的内容而引起的。当前的结果支持这样一种想法,即刷新是通过将信息检索成关注焦点的过程来进行的。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(22),4
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 1001–1006
  • 总页数 11
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号