首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Confidence Interval Estimation for Pooled-Sample Biomonitoring from a Complex Survey Design
【2h】

Confidence Interval Estimation for Pooled-Sample Biomonitoring from a Complex Survey Design

机译:复杂调查设计中样本池生物监测的置信区间估计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is using a weighted pooled-sample design to characterize concentrations of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the U.S. population. Historically, this characterization has been based on individual measurements of these compounds in body fluid or tissue from representative samples of the population using stratified multistage selection. Pooling samples before making analytical measurements reduces the costs of biomonitoring by reducing the number of analyses. Pooling samples also allows for larger sample volumes which can result in fewer left censored results. But because samples are pooled across the sampling design cells of the original survey, direct calculation of the design effects needed for accurate standard error and confidence interval (CI) estimation is not possible. So in this paper I describe a multiple imputation (MI) method for calculating design effects associated with pooled-sample estimates. I also evaluate the method presented, by simulating NHANES individual sample data from which artificial pools are created for use in a comparison of pooled-sample estimates with estimates based on individual samples. To further illustrate and evaluate the method proposed in this paper I present geometric mean and various percentile estimates along with their 95% CIs for two chemical compounds from NHANES 2005-2006 pooled samples and compare them to individual-sample based estimates from NHANES 1999-2004.
机译:美国国家疾病预防控制中心(CDC)使用加权汇总样本设计来表征美国人口中持久性有机污染物(POPs)的浓度。从历史上看,此表征是基于使用分层多阶段选择从人群代表性样品中对体液或组织中这些化合物的单独测量得出的。在进行分析测量之前合并样品,可以减少分析次数,从而降低了生物监测的成本。合并样本还允许更大的样本量,这可能导致更少的左审查结果。但是由于样本是在原始调查的抽样设计单元中汇总的,因此无法直接计算准确的标准误差和置信区间(CI)估计所需的设计效果。因此,在本文中,我描述了一种用于计算与汇总样本估算值相关的设计效果的多重插补(MI)方法。我还通过模拟NHANES各个样本数据来评估提出的方法,从这些数据中创建了人工池,用于将合并样本估计值与基于单个样本的估计值进行比较。为了进一步说明和评估本文提出的方法,我给出了来自NHANES 2005-2006合并样本的两种化合物的几何均值和各种百分位数估计以及其95%CI,并将它们与NHANES 1999-2004的基于单个样本的估计进行比较。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Samuel P. Caudill;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(85),-1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 40–45
  • 总页数 16
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号