首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Effect of Two Speed Endurance Training Regimes on Performance of Soccer Players
【2h】

The Effect of Two Speed Endurance Training Regimes on Performance of Soccer Players

机译:两种速度耐力训练方案对足球运动员成绩的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In order to better understand the specificity of training adaptations, we compared the effects of two different anaerobic training regimes on various types of soccer-related exercise performances. During the last 3 weeks of the competitive season, thirteen young male professional soccer players (age 18.5±1 yr, height 179.5±6.5 cm, body mass 74.3±6.5 kg) reduced the training volume by ~20% and replaced their habitual fitness conditioning work with either speed endurance production (SEP; n = 6) or speed endurance maintenance (SEM; n = 7) training, three times per wk. SEP training consisted of 6–8 reps of 20-s all-out running bouts followed by 2 min of passive recovery, whereas SEM training was characterized by 6–8 x 20-s all-out efforts interspersed with 40 s of passive recovery. SEP training reduced (p<0.01) the total time in a repeated sprint ability test (RSAt) by 2.5%. SEM training improved the 200-m sprint performance (from 26.59±0.70 to 26.02±0.62 s, p<0.01) and had a likely beneficial impact on the percentage decrement score of the RSA test (from 4.07±1.28 to 3.55±1.01%) but induced a very likely impairment in RSAt (from 83.81±2.37 to 84.65±2.27 s). The distance covered in the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery test level 2 was 10.1% (p<0.001) and 3.8% (p<0.05) higher after SEP and SEM training, respectively, with possibly greater improvements following SEP compared to SEM. No differences were observed in the 20- and 40-m sprint performances. In conclusion, these two training strategies target different determinants of soccer-related physical performance. SEP improved repeated sprint and high-intensity intermittent exercise performance, whereas SEM increased muscles’ ability to maximize fatigue tolerance and maintain speed development during both repeated all-out and continuous short-duration maximal exercises. These results provide new insight into the precise nature of a stimulus necessary to improve specific types of athletic performance in trained young soccer players.
机译:为了更好地理解训练适应性的特殊性,我们比较了两种不同的无氧训练方式对各种与足球有关的运动表现的影响。在比赛季节的最后3周内,十三名年轻的男性职业足球运动员(年龄18.5±1岁,身高179.5±6.5 cm,体重74.3±6.5 kg)使训练量减少了约20%,并取代了他们惯常的健身条件每星期3次,进行速度耐力生产(SEP; n = 6)或速度耐力维持(SEM; n = 7)训练。 SEP训练包括6-8次20秒钟全力以赴的跑步动作,然后进行2分钟的被动恢复,而SEM训练的特点是6-8 x 20秒钟全力以赴的动作与40 s的被动恢复相结合。 SEP训练将重复冲刺能力测试(RSAt)中的总时间减少了(p <0.01)2.5%。 SEM训练提高了200米的冲刺性能(从26.59±0.70到26.02±0.62 s,p <0.01),并且可能对RSA测试的百分比减量分数产生有益的影响(从4.07±1.28到3.55±1.01%)但可能导致RSAt受损(从83.81±2.37到84.65±2.27 s)。 SEP和SEM训练后,“悠悠球间歇恢复”测试等级2所覆盖的距离分别高出10.1%(p <0.001)和3.8%(p <0.05),与SEM相比,SEP后可能有更大的改善。在20米和40米的短跑性能中未观察到差异。总之,这两种训练策略针对与足球相关的身体表现的不同决定因素。 SEP可改善重复冲刺和高强度间歇运动的表现,而SEM可增强肌肉在反复进行的全力和连续短期最大运动中最大化疲劳耐受性并保持速度发展的能力。这些结果提供了对于在训练有素的年轻足球运动员中改善特定类型的运动表现所必需的刺激的精确性质的新见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号