首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent and AIFs derived from reference tissues
【2h】

Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent and AIFs derived from reference tissues

机译:直接从低剂量和标准剂量造影剂的动脉中测得的动脉输入功能(AIF)以及从参考组织中获得的AIF

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Measurements of arterial input function (AIF) can have large systematic errors at standard contrast agent doses in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). We compared measured AIFs from low dose (AIFLD) and standard dose (AIFSD) contrast agent injections, as well as the AIF derived from a muscle reference tissue and artery (AIFref). Twenty-two prostate cancer patients underwent DCE-MRI. Data were acquired on a 3 T scanner using an mDixon sequence. Gadobenate dimeglumine was injected twice, at doses of 0.015 and 0.085 mmol/kg. Directly measured AIFs were fitted with empirical mathematical models (EMMs) and compared to the AIF derived from a muscle reference tissue (AIFref). EMMs accurately fitted the AIFs. The 1st and 2nd pass peaks were visualized in AIFLD, but not in AIFSD, thus the peak and shape of AIFSD could not be accurately measured directly. The average scaling factor between AIFSD and AIFLD in the washout phase was only 56% of the contrast dose ratio (~6:1). The shape and magnitude of AIFref closely approximated that of AIFLD after empirically determined dose-dependent normalization. This suggests that AIFref may be a good approximation of the local AIF.
机译:在动态对比增强MRI(DCE-MRI)中,在标准造影剂剂量下,动脉输入功能(AIF)的测量可能会有较大的系统误差。我们比较了从低剂量(AIFLD)和标准剂量(AIFSD)造影剂注射中测得的AIF,以及从肌肉参考组织和动脉(AIFref)获得的AIF。 22名前列腺癌患者接受了DCE-MRI检查。使用mDixon序列在3 T扫描仪上采集数据。加多贝酸二甲双胍被注射两次,剂量为0.015和0.085 mmol / kg。直接测量的AIF符合经验数学模型(EMM),并与源自肌肉参考组织(AIFref)的AIF进行比较。 EMM准确地安装了AIF。在AIFLD中可以看到第一和第二次通过峰,而在AIFSD中则看不到,因此无法直接准确地测量AIFSD的峰和形状。在冲洗阶段,AIFSD和AIFLD之间的平均比例因子仅为对比剂剂量比的56%(〜6:1)。经过经验确定的剂量依赖性归一化后,AIFref的形状和大小非常接近AIFLD的形状和大小。这表明AIFref可能是本地AIF的良好近似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号