首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Systematic Evaluation of Data-Independent Acquisition for Sensitive and Reproducible Proteomics – a Prototype Design for a Single Injection Assay
【2h】

Systematic Evaluation of Data-Independent Acquisition for Sensitive and Reproducible Proteomics – a Prototype Design for a Single Injection Assay

机译:敏感和可复制的蛋白质组学的数据独立采集的系统评估–单次进样的原型设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Data-independent acquisition (DIA) based proteomics has become increasingly complicated in recent years due to the vast number of workflows described, coupled with a lack of studies indicating a rational framework for selecting effective settings to use. To address this issue and provide a resource for the proteomics community, we compared twelve DIA methods that assay tryptic peptides using various mass-isolation windows. Our findings indicate the most sensitive single injection LC-DIA method uses 6 m/z isolation windows to analyze the densely populated tryptic peptide range from 450–730 m/z, which allowed quantification of 4,465 E. coli peptides. In contrast, using the sequential windowed acquisition of all theoretical fragment-ions (SWATH) approach with 26 m/z isolation windows across the entire 400–1200 m/z range, allowed quantification of only 3,309 peptides. This reduced sensitivity with 26 m/z windows is caused by an increase in co-eluting compounds with similar precursor values detected in the same tandem MS spectra, which lowers the signal-to-noise of peptide fragment-ion chromatograms and reduces the amount of low abundance peptides that can be quantified from 410–920 m/z. Above 920 m/z, more peptides were quantified with 26 m/z windows due to substantial peptide 13C isotope distributions that parse peptide ions into separate isolation windows. Since reproducible quantification has been a long-standing aim of quantitative proteomics, and is a so-called trait of DIA, we sought to determine whether precursor-level chromatograms used in some methods rather than their fragment-level counterparts have similar precision. Our data show extracted fragmention chromatograms are the reason DIA provides superior reproducibility.
机译:近年来,由于所描述的工作流程众多,加上基于数据独立获取(DIA)的蛋白质组学,该蛋白质组学变得越来越复杂,并且缺乏研究表明需要一个合理的框架来选择要使用的有效设置。为了解决此问题并为蛋白质组学界提供资源,我们比较了使用各种质量隔离窗口分析十二种胰蛋白酶肽的DIA方法。我们的发现表明,最灵敏的单次进样LC-DIA方法使用6 m / z的隔离窗口来分析450-730 m / z的人群密集的胰蛋白酶肽,从而可以定量4,465种大肠杆菌肽。相比之下,使用所有理论碎片离子的顺序窗口采集(SWATH)方法在整个400-1200 m / z范围内具有26 m / z的隔离窗口,仅允许定量3,309个肽段。在相同的串联MS质谱图中检测到的具有相似前体值的共洗脱化合物增加,导致26 m / z窗口的灵敏度降低,这降低了肽片段离子色谱图的信噪比并减少了低丰度多肽,可在410–920 m / z范围内进行定量。高于920 m / z时,由于大量的 13 C同位素分布将肽离子解析为单独的分离窗口,因此在26 m / z窗口中可以定量更多的肽。由于可重现的定量化一直是定量蛋白质组学的长期目标,并且是DIA的所谓特征,因此我们试图确定某些方法中使用的前体级色谱图而不是片段级对应物具有相似的精度。我们的数据显示,提取的碎片色谱图是DIA提供卓越重现性的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号