首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Role of T1 Pelvic Angle in Assessing Sagittal Balance in Outpatients With Unspecific Low Back Pain
【2h】

Role of T1 Pelvic Angle in Assessing Sagittal Balance in Outpatients With Unspecific Low Back Pain

机译:T1骨盆角在非特异性下腰痛门诊患者矢状面平衡评估中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the study was to explore the significance of T1 pelvic angle (TPA) for assessment of sagittal balance in a cohort of Chinese patients with unspecific low back pain.TPA has been commonly used to assess sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. However, whether TPA could be used to assess sagittal balance in patients with unspecific low back pain effectively remains unanswered.Medical records of outpatients with unspecific low back pain who received treatment in our outpatient clinic between September 2013 and November 2014 were reviewed. Demographic data and radiographic data were collected. Correlation coefficients between TPA and other sagittal parameters were analyzed, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was performed to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of TPA. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they were well-aligned (TPA ≤ 20°) or poorly aligned (TPA > 20°), and then demographic and sagittal parameters were compared between the 2 groups of patients.A total of 97 patients with unspecific low back pain were included in this study. The inter- and intraobserver reliability of the TPA measure had excellent agreement (ICC = 0.985 and 0.919, respectively). There were significant correlations between TPA and age, LL, PT, PI, T1SPI, SVA, and NRS (all P < 0.05). Of the 38 well-aligned patients in Group A, SVA was ≤5 cm in 33 (86.84%) patients and >5 cm in the other 5 (13.16%) patients, and of the 59 poorly aligned patients in Group B, SVA was >5 cm in 42 (71.19%) patients and ≤5 cm in the other 17 (28.81%) patients. There were significant differences in age, LL, SS, PT, PI, T1SPI, SVA, and NRS between the 2 groups of patients, but no significant difference was observed in TK and TL.TPA could be used to assess sagittal balance in outpatients with unspecific low back pain effectively.
机译:这项研究的目的是探讨T1骨盆角(TPA)对中国非特异性下背痛患者队列矢状面平衡评估的意义。TPA通常用于评估成人脊柱畸形的矢状面平衡。然而,是否可以使用TPA有效评估非特异性下背痛患者的矢状面平衡尚无定论.2013年9月至2014年11月间在我院门诊接受治疗的非特异性下背痛患者的医疗记录已得到审查。收集了人口统计数据和射线照相数据。分析了TPA与其他矢状参数之间的相关系数,并进行了组内相关系数(ICC)分析以评估TPA观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性。根据患者对位良好(TPA≤20°)或对位不良(TPA> 20°)分为两组,然后比较两组患者的人口统计学和矢状面参数,共97例具有非特异性腰痛的患者包括在这项研究中。 TPA措施的观察者之间和观察者内部可靠性具有极好的一致性(ICC = 0.985和0.919)。 TPA与年龄,LL,PT,PI,T1SPI,SVA和NRS之间存在显着相关性(所有P <0.05)。在A组的38位患者中,SVA在≤5cm的患者中占33(86.84%)位,在其他5位(13.16%)患者中≥5cm,在B组的59位患者中,SVA≤5cm 42例(71.19%)患者> 5 cm,其余17例(28.81%)≤5cm。两组患者的年龄,LL,SS,PT,PI,T1SPI,SVA和NRS有显着差异,但TK和TL无显着差异.TPA可用于评估门诊患者的矢状面平衡非特异性腰痛有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号