首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Glycemic Control Modifies Difference in Mortality Risk Between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in Incident Dialysis Patients With Diabetes
【2h】

Glycemic Control Modifies Difference in Mortality Risk Between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in Incident Dialysis Patients With Diabetes

机译:血糖控制可改善糖尿病事件透析患者血液透析和腹膜透析死亡率风险的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although numerous studies have tried to elucidate the best dialysis modality in end-stage renal disease patients with diabetes, results were inconsistent and varied with the baseline characteristics of patients. Furthermore, none of the previous studies on diabetic dialysis patients accounted for the impact of glycemic control. We explored whether glycemic control had modifying effect on mortality between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in incident dialysis patients with diabetes.A total of 902 diabetic patients who started dialysis between August 2008 and December 2013 were included from a nationwide prospective cohort in Korea. Based on the interaction analysis between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and dialysis modalities for patient survival (P for interaction = 0.004), subjects were stratified into good and poor glycemic control groups (HbA1c< or ≥8.0%). Differences in survival rates according to dialysis modalities were ascertained in each glycemic control group after propensity score matching.During a median follow-up duration of 28 months, the relative risk of death was significantly lower in PD compared with HD in the whole cohort and unmatched patients (whole cohort, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47–0.90, P = 0.01; patients with available HbA1c [n = 773], HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.46–0.91, P = 0.01). In the good glycemic control group, there was a significant survival advantage of PD (HbA1c <8.0%, HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37–0.94, P = 0.03). However, there was no significant difference in survival rates between PD and HD in the poor glycemic control group (HbA1c ≥8.0%, HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.46–2.76, P = 0.80).This study demonstrated that the degree of glycemic control modified the mortality risk between dialysis modalities, suggesting that glycemic control might partly contribute to better survival of PD in incident dialysis patients with diabetes.
机译:尽管许多研究试图阐明糖尿病终末期肾病患者的最佳透析方式,但结果不一致,且随患者的基线特征而异。此外,先前关于糖尿病透析患者的研究均未解释血糖控制的影响。我们探讨了血糖控制是否对糖尿病事件透析患者的血液透析(HD)和腹膜透析(PD)之间的死亡率有调节作用.2008年8月至2013年12月在全国范围内的前瞻性队列研究共纳入902名糖尿病患者。在韩国。根据血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)和透析模式对患者生存的相互作用分析(相互作用P = 0.004),受试者分为好血糖对照组和差血糖对照组(HbA1c <或≥8.0%)。在倾向评分匹配后,每个血糖对照组均确定了根据透析方式的生存率差异。在中位随访28个月期间,PD的相对死亡风险明显低于HD,在整个队列中均如此。患者(整个队列,危险比[HR] = 0.65,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.47-0.90,P = 0.01;有可用HbA1c的患者[n = 773],HR = 0.64,95%CI = 0.46-0.91 ,P = 0.01)。在血糖良好的对照组中,PD具有显着的生存优势(HbA1c <8.0%,HR = 0.59,95%CI = 0.37-0.94,P = 0.03)。然而,血糖不良对照组的PD和HD生存率没有显着差异(HbA1c≥8.0%,HR = 1.21,95%CI = 0.46-2.76,P = 0.80)。血糖控制改变了透析方式之间的死亡率风险,这表明血糖控制可能部分有助于糖尿病事件透析患者PD的更好生存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号