首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluating the Validity of Simplified Chinese Version of LIWC in Detecting Psychological Expressions in Short Texts on Social Network Services
【2h】

Evaluating the Validity of Simplified Chinese Version of LIWC in Detecting Psychological Expressions in Short Texts on Social Network Services

机译:评估LIWC简体中文版本在检测社交网络服务中短文本中的心理表达时的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The increasing need of automated analyzing web texts especially the short texts on Social Network Services (SNS) brings new demands of computerized text analysis instruments. The psychometric properties are the basis of the extensive use of these instruments such as the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). For this study, Sina Weibo statuses were analyzed via rater coding and Simplified Chinese version of LIWC (SCLIWC), in order to evaluate the validity of SCLIWC in detecting psychological expressions in Weibo statuses (n = 60) and in identifying the psychological meaning of a single Weibo status (n = 11). Significant correlations between human ratings and SCLIWC scores and the high sensitivities of capturing single statuses with certain expressions identified by raters, proved the validity of SCLIWC in detecting psychological expressions. The results also suggested that, the efficiency of SCLIWC in detecting psychological expressions of SNS short texts could be higher if using status count scoring method, rather than the word count method as the common usage of LIWC. However, SCLIWC may not perform well in identifying the psychological meaning of a single piece of SNS short text because of its over-identification of target expressions. This study provided primary evidence of validity of SCLIWC, as well as the proper way of using it efficiently on SNS short texts.
机译:自动分析Web文本,尤其是社交网络服务(SNS)上的短文本的需求不断增长,带来了计算机化文本分析工具的新需求。心理测量特性是广泛使用这些工具(例如语言查询和字数统计(LIWC))的基础。在本研究中,通过评估者编码和简体中文版的LIWC(SCLIWC)分析了新浪微博的状态,以评估SCLIWC在检测微博状态(n = 60)中的心理表达并确定a的心理意义方面的有效性。单次微博状态(n = 11)。人类评分与SCLIWC得分之间的显着相关性以及由评估者识别的具有某些表达的捕获单个状态的高度敏感性证明了SCLIWC在检测心理表达中的有效性。研究结果还表明,如果使用状态计数评分方法,而不是使用单词计数方法作为LIWC的常用方法,SCLIWC在检测SNS短文本的心理表达方面的效率会更高。但是,SCLIWC在识别单篇SNS短文本的心理含义时可能表现不佳,因为它过度识别了目标表达。这项研究提供了SCLIWC有效性的主要证据,以及在SNS短文本上有效使用它的正确方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号