首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff
【2h】

A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff

机译:澳大利亚大学工作人员感知程序正义预测因素的纵向研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: This study examined the factors that predict employees' perceptions of procedural justice in university settings. The paper also reviews the ethical aspects of justice and psychological contracts within employment relationships.>Design/Methodology/Approach: The study examined the predictors of perceived procedural justice in a two-wave longitudinal sample of 945 employees from 13 universities by applying the Job Demands-Resources theoretical model of stress. The proposed predictors were classified into two categories: Job demands of work pressure and work-home conflict; and job resources of job security, autonomy, trust in senior management, and trust in supervisor. The predictor model also examined job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment, demographic (age, gender, tenure, role) and individual characteristics (negative affectivity, job involvement) as well as Time 1 (T1) perceptions of procedural justice to ensure that tests were rigorous.>Findings: A series of hierarchical multiple regression analyses found that job satisfaction at T1 was the strongest predictor of perceived procedural justice at Time 2. Employees' trust in senior management, and their length of tenure also positively predicted justice perceptions. There were also differences between academic and non-academic staff groups, as non-academic employees' level of job satisfaction, trust in senior management, and their length of organizational tenure predicted procedural justice perceptions, whereas for academics, only job satisfaction predicted perceived justice. For the “all staff” category, job satisfaction was a dominant and enduring predictor of justice, and employees' trust in senior management also predicted justice.>Research limitations/implications: Results highlight the importance of workplace factors in enhancing fair procedures to encourage reciprocity from employees. As perceived procedural justice is also conceptually linked to the psychological contract between employees-employers, it is possible that employees' levels of job satisfaction and perceptions of trust in senior management, relative to other work attitudinal outcomes, may be more effective for improving the broader working environment, and promoting staff morale.>Originality/value: This study adds to research on applied business ethics as it focuses on the ethical aspects of perceived procedural justice and highlights the importance of workplace factors in enhancing fair procedures in organizational policy to encourage reciprocity and promote healthy organizational environments.
机译:>目的:本研究调查了预测员工在大学环境中对程序正义感的因素。本文还回顾了雇佣关系中的正义和心理契约的道德方面。>设计/方法论/方法:该研究在来自19位参与者的945名员工的两波纵向样本中研究了感知到的程序正义的预测因素。大学通过运用工作需求-资源压力理论模型。拟议的预测因素分为两类:工作压力对工作的需求和家庭冲突。和工作资源,包括工作安全性,自治性,对高级管理人员的信任以及对主管的信任。预测模型还检查了工作满意度和情感组织承诺,人口统计(年龄,性别,任期,角色)和个人特征(负面情感,工作参与)以及对程序正义的时间1(T1)感知,以确保测试严格。>发现:一系列分层多元回归分析发现,在T2时,T1的工作满意度是感知到的程序公正性的最强预测因子。员工对高级管理人员的信任以及任职期限也得到了积极预测正义感。学术人员和非学术人员之间也存在差异,因为非学术员工的工作满意度,对高级管理人员的信任以及他们的组织任职年限可预测程序正义感,而对于学术界,只有工作满意度可预测正义感。对于“所有员工”类别,工作满意度是正义的主要且持久的预测指标,而员工对高级管理层的信任也可以预测正义。>研究局限性/含义:加强公平的程序,以鼓励员工互惠。由于感知到的程序正义在概念上也与雇员与雇主之间的心理契约相关联,因此,相对于其他工作态度成果,雇员的工作满意度和对高级管理层的信任感可能会更有效地改善>原创性/价值:该研究增加了对应用商业道德的研究,因为它侧重于感知到的程序正义的道德方面,并强调了工作场所因素在增强公平程序中的重要性在组织政策中鼓励互惠并促进健康的组织环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号