首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Three common misuses of P values
【2h】

Three common misuses of P values

机译:P值的三种常见误用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

“Significance” has a specific meaning in science, especially in statistics. The p-value as a measure of statistical significance (evidence against a null hypothesis) has long been used in statistical inference and has served as a key player in science and research. Despite its clear mathematical definition and original purpose, and being just one of the many statistical measures/criteria, its role has been over-emphasized along with hypothesis testing. Observing and reflecting on this practice, some journals have attempted to ban reporting of p-values, and the American Statistical Association (for the first time in its 177 year old history) released a statement on p-values in 2016. In this article, we intend to review the correct definition of the p-value as well as its common misuses, in the hope that our article is useful to clinicians and researchers.
机译:“重要性”在科学中尤其是统计学中具有特定的含义。 p值作为衡量统计显着性(针对原假设的证据)的一种方法,长期以来一直用于统计推断,并已成为科学研究的关键角色。尽管它具有明确的数学定义和原始目的,并且只是众多统计度量/标准之一,但其功能在假设检验中被过分强调。观察并反思这种做法,一些期刊试图禁止报告p值,美国统计协会(这是其177年的历史上第一次)在2016年发表了有关p值的声明。在本文中,我们打算回顾p值的正确定义及其常见误用,以希望我们的文章对临床医生和研究人员有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号