首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
【2h】

Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy

机译:阿霉素联合异环磷酰胺治疗非圆形细胞软组织肉瘤患者预防性联合止吐的疗效分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) therapy. Forty NRC-STS patients were enrolled, their median age was 50 years (range 18–74), and 13 (32.5%) were female. Median cycle number of AI therapy was 4. Twenty patients received the doublet antiemetic prophylaxis (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone), and 20 received triplet (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant). In the overall period, complete response rate for nausea and emesis in the triplet group was significantly higher than that in the doublet group (70% vs 35%; P = 0.027). Patients with no-emesis in the overall period were more frequently observed in the triplet group than in the doublet group (90% vs 65%; P = 0.058). All toxicities other than emesis were almost equivalent in both the groups. These results suggest that a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis may be optimal in the treatment with AI therapy for NRC-STS.
机译:对于非圆形细胞软组织肉瘤(NRC-STS)患者,适当的止吐药对中度致呕的化学疗法的预防尚不清楚。我们回顾性研究了阿瑞吡联合止吐预防在接受阿霉素加异环磷酰胺(AI)治疗的NRC-STS患者中的疗效和安全性。入组40例NRC-STS患者,中位年龄为50岁(18-74岁),女性为13岁(32.5%)。 AI治疗的中位周期数为4。20例患者接受了双重保护性止吐药(5-羟色胺3受体拮抗剂和地塞米松),20例接受了双重保护性药物(5-羟色胺3受体拮抗剂,地塞米松和阿瑞吡坦)。在整个时期,三联体组对恶心和呕吐的完全缓解率显着高于双联体组(70%比35%; P = 0.027)。三联体组比双联体组更容易观察到整个期间无呕吐的患者(90%vs 65%; P = 0.058)。两组中除呕吐外的所有毒性几乎相同。这些结果表明,在AI治疗NRC-STS的过程中,三联止吐预防可能是最佳的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号