首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of convergent beam electron diffraction and annular bright field atomic imaging for GaN polarity determination
【2h】

Comparison of convergent beam electron diffraction and annular bright field atomic imaging for GaN polarity determination

机译:会聚束电子衍射和环形亮场原子成像用于GaN极性测定的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A comparison of two electron microscopy techniques used to determine the polarity of GaN nanowires is presented. The techniques are convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) in TEM mode and annular bright field (ABF) imaging in aberration corrected STEM mode. Both measurements were made at nominally the same locations on a variety of GaN nanowires. In all cases the two techniques gave the same polarity result. An important aspect of the study was the calibration of the CBED pattern rotation relative to the TEM image. Three different microscopes were used for CBED measurements. For all three instruments there was a substantial rotation of the diffraction pattern (120 or 180°) relative to the image, which, if unaccounted for, would have resulted in incorrect polarity determination. The study also shows that structural defects such as inversion domains can be readily identified by ABF imaging, but may escape identification by CBED. The relative advantages of the two techniques are discussed.
机译:介绍了两种用于确定GaN纳米线极性的电子显微镜技术的比较。这些技术是TEM模式下的会聚束电子衍射(CBED)和像差校正STEM模式下的环形明场(ABF)成像。两种测量均在各种GaN纳米线上的名义上相同的位置进行。在所有情况下,两种技术均给出相同的极性结果。该研究的重要方面是相对于TEM图像校准CBED图案旋转。三种不同的显微镜用于CBED测量。对于所有三种仪器,衍射图样都相对于图像有很大的旋转(120或180°),如果不加以说明,将导致极性确定错误。这项研究还表明,通过ABF成像可以很容易地识别出结构缺陷(如反型结构域),但可以通过CBED进行识别。讨论了这两种技术的相对优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号