首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Is biochar-manure co-compost a better solution for soil health improvement and N2O emissions mitigation?
【2h】

Is biochar-manure co-compost a better solution for soil health improvement and N2O emissions mitigation?

机译:生物炭与粪肥共同构成土壤健康改善和减少N2O排放的更好解决方案吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Land application of compost has been a promising remediation strategy for soil health and environmental quality, but substantial emissions of greenhouse gases, especially N2O, need to be controlled during making and using compost of high N-load wastes, such as chicken manure. Biochar as a bulking agent for composting has been proposed as a novel approach to solve this issue, due to large surface area and porosity, and thus high ion exchange and adsorption capacity. Here, we compared the impacts of biochar-chicken manure co-compost (BM) and chicken manure compost (M) on soil biological properties and processes in a 120-d microcosm experiment at the soil moisture of 60% water-filled pore space. Our results showed that BM and M addition significantly enhanced soil total C and N, inorganic and KCl-extractable organic N, microbial biomass C and N, cellulase enzyme activity, abundance of N2O-producing bacteria and fungi, and gas emissions of N2O and CO2. However, compared to the M treatment, BM significantly reduced soil CO2 and N2O emissions by 35% and 27%, respectively, over the experimental period. The 15N-N2O site preference, i.e., difference between 15N-N2O in the center position (δ15Nα) and the end position (δ15Nβ), was ~17‰ for M and ~26‰ for BM during the first week of incubation, suggesting that BM suppressed N2O from bacterial denitrification and/or nitrifier denitrification. This inference was well aligned with the observation that soil glucosaminidase activity and nirK gene abundance were lower in BM than M treatment. Further, soil peroxidase activity was greater in BM than M treatment, implying soil organic C was more stable in BM treatment. Our data demonstrated that the biochar-chicken manure co-compost could substantially reduce soil N2O emissions compared to chicken manure compost, via controls on soil organic C stabilization and the activities of microbial functional groups, especially bacterial denitrifiers.
机译:堆肥的土地施用已成为土壤健康和环境质量的有希望的补救策略,但是在制作和使用高氮负荷废物(例如鸡粪)的堆肥期间,必须控制温室气体(尤其是N2O)的大量排放。由于大面积和孔隙率,以及因此高的离子交换和吸附能力,生物炭作为堆肥的填充剂已被提出作为解决该问题的新方法。在这里,我们在60%含水量的60%含水量的土壤湿度下,在120天的微观实验中比较了生物炭-鸡粪粪便堆肥(BM)和鸡粪堆肥(M)对土壤生物学特性和过程的影响。我们的结果表明,添加BM和M可以显着提高土壤中的总C和N,可从无机和KCl提取的有机N,微生物生物量C和N,纤维素酶活性,产生N2O的细菌和真菌的丰度以及N2O和CO2的气体排放。然而,与M处理相比,在试验期间,BM分别显着减少了35%和27%的土壤CO2和N2O排放。 15 N-N2O站点首选项,即中心位置的 15 N-N2O之间的差异(δ 15 N α< / sup>)和终位(δ 15 N β),在孵化的第一周,M约为BM,BM约为26‰,这表明BM抑制了细菌反硝化和/或硝化器反硝化产生的N2O。该推论与以下观察结果很好地吻合:BM的土壤葡萄糖苷酶活性和nirK基因丰度低于M处理。此外,BM处理的土壤过氧化物酶活性高于M处理,这表明BM处理的土壤有机碳更稳定。我们的数据表明,通过控制土壤有机碳的稳定和微生物功能基团(尤其是细菌反硝化剂)的活性,与鸡粪堆肥相比,生物炭-鸡粪混合肥料可以大大减少土壤N2O排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号