首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >‘Green’ on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel
【2h】

‘Green’ on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel

机译:地面上绿色但不空中:亲环境态度与家庭行为有关但与随意飞行无关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The rise in greenhouse gas emissions from air travel could be reduced by individuals voluntarily abstaining from, or reducing, flights for leisure and recreational purposes. In theory, we might expect that people with pro-environmental value orientations and concerns about the risks of climate change, and those who engage in more pro-environmental household behaviours, would also be more likely to abstain from such voluntary air travel, or at least to fly less far. Analysis of two large datasets from the United Kingdom, weighted to be representative of the whole population, tested these associations. Using zero-inflated Poisson regression models, we found that, after accounting for potential confounders, there was no association between individuals' environmental attitudes, concern over climate change, or their routine pro-environmental household behaviours, and either their propensity to take non-work related flights, or the distances flown by those who do so. These findings contrasted with those for pro-environmental household behaviours, where associations with environmental attitudes and concern were observed. Our results offer little encouragement for policies aiming to reduce discretionary air travel through pro-environmental advocacy, or through ‘spill-over’ from interventions to improve environmental impacts of household routines.
机译:出于自愿目的,出于休闲和娱乐目的而放弃或减少航班的人,可以减少航空旅行带来的温室气体排放量的增加。从理论上讲,我们可能希望那些具有亲环境价值取向并关注气候变化风险的人,以及那些从事更多亲环境家庭行为的人,也更有可能放弃这种自愿的航空旅行,或者至少飞不远。对来自英国的两个大型数据集进行了分析,权重代表了整个人口,测试了这些关联。使用零膨胀的Poisson回归模型,我们发现,在考虑了潜在的混杂因素之后,个人的环境态度,对气候变化的关注或其日常的亲环境家庭行为与他们采取非环保措施的倾向之间没有关联。与工作相关的航班,或与之相关的飞行距离。这些发现与亲环境家庭行为的发现相反,后者观察到与环境态度和关注有关。我们的结果几乎没有鼓励旨在通过环保倡导或通过干预措施“溢出”来改善家庭例行环境影响的旨在减少可自由支配航空旅行的政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号