首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Using Mendelian randomization to determine causal effects of maternal pregnancy (intrauterine) exposures on offspring outcomes: Sources of bias and methods for assessing them
【2h】

Using Mendelian randomization to determine causal effects of maternal pregnancy (intrauterine) exposures on offspring outcomes: Sources of bias and methods for assessing them

机译:使用孟德尔随机法确定孕产妇(宫内)暴露对后代结局的因果关系:偏见的来源和评估方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mendelian randomization (MR), the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to test causal effects, is increasingly used in aetiological epidemiology. Few of the methodological developments in MR have considered the specific situation of using genetic IVs to test the causal effect of exposures in pregnant women on postnatal offspring outcomes. In this paper, we describe specific ways in which the IV assumptions might be violated when MR is used to test such intrauterine effects. We highlight the importance of considering the extent to which there is overlap between genetic variants in offspring that influence their outcome with genetic variants used as IVs in their mothers. Where there is overlap, and particularly if it generates a strong association of maternal genetic IVs with offspring outcome via the offspring genotype, the exclusion restriction assumption of IV analyses will be violated. We recommend a set of analyses that ought to be considered when MR is used to address research questions concerned with intrauterine effects on post-natal offspring outcomes, and provide details of how these can be undertaken and interpreted. These additional analyses include the use of genetic data from offspring and fathers, examining associations using maternal non-transmitted alleles, and using simulated data in sensitivity analyses (for which we provide code). We explore the extent to which new methods that have been developed for exploring violation of the exclusion restriction assumption in the two-sample setting (MR-Egger and median based methods) might be used when exploring intrauterine effects in one-sample MR. We provide a list of recommendations that researchers should use when applying MR to test the effects of intrauterine exposures on postnatal offspring outcomes and use an illustrative example with real data to demonstrate how our recommendations can be applied and subsequent results appropriately interpreted.
机译:孟德尔随机化(MR)是遗传变异作为工具变量(IVs)检验因果关系的一种方法,在病原学流行病学中越来越多地使用。 MR的方法学进展很少考虑使用遗传IV来检验孕妇暴露对产后结果的因果关系的特殊情况。在本文中,我们描述了当使用MR来测试这种宫内效果时违反IV假设的特定方式。我们强调指出,考虑后代的遗传变异在多大程度上具有重叠的重要性,这些遗传变异与遗传变异在其母亲中用作IV会影响其结果。如果存在重叠,特别是如果它通过子代基因型产生了母本遗传IV与子代结局的强烈关联,则将违反IV分析的排除限制假设。我们建议使用MR解决与宫内节育对产后结局影响有关的研究问题时应考虑的一组分析,并详细说明如何进行和解释。这些附加分析包括使用后代和父亲的遗传数据,使用母体非传播等位基因检查关联以及在敏感性分析(我们提供了代码)中使用模拟数据。我们探讨了在探索单样本MR的宫腔效应时可以使用何种新方法来探索在两个样本的环境中违反排他性限制假设的新方法(MR-Egger和基于中位数的方法)的程度。我们提供了一系列建议,研究人员在应用MR来测试宫内暴露对出生后代结局的影响时应使用这些建议,并使用带有真实数据的说明性示例来说明如何应用我们的建议并适当解释后续结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号