首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A framework to quantify the strength of ecological links between an environmental stressor and final ecosystem services
【2h】

A framework to quantify the strength of ecological links between an environmental stressor and final ecosystem services

机译:量化环境压力源与最终生态系统服务之间生态联系强度的框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Anthropogenic stressors such as climate change, increased fire frequency, and pollution drive shifts in ecosystem function and resilience. Scientists generally rely on biological indicators of these stressors to signal that ecosystem conditions have been altered. However, these biological indicators are not always capable of being directly related to ecosystem components that provide benefits to humans and/or can be used to evaluate the cost-benefit of a change in health of the component (ecosystem services). Therefore, we developed the STEPS (>STressor – >Ecological >Production function – final ecosystem >Services) Framework to link changes in a biological indicator of a stressor to final ecosystem services. The STEPS framework produces “chains” of ecological components that explore the breadth of impacts resulting from the change of a stressor. Chains are comprised of the biological indicator, the ecological production function (EPF; which uses ecological components to link the biological indicator to a final ecosystem service), and the user group who directly uses, appreciates, or values the component. The framework uses a qualitative score (High, Medium, Low) to describe the Strength of Science (SOS) for the relationship between each component in the EPF.We tested the STEPS Framework within a workshop setting using the exceedance of critical loads of air pollution as a model stressor and the Final Ecosystem Goods and Services Classification System (FEGS-CS) to describe final ecosystem services. We identified chains for four modes of ecological response to deposition: aquatic acidification, aquatic eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, and terrestrial eutrophication. The workshop participants identified 183 unique EPFs linking a change in a biological indicator to a FEGS; and when accounting for the multiple beneficiaries, we ended with 1104 chains. The SOS scores were effective in identifying chains with the highest confidence ranking as well as those where more research is needed. The STEPS framework could be adapted to any system in which a stressor is modifying a biological component. The results of the analysis can be used by the social science community to apply valuation measures to multiple or selected chains, providing a comprehensive analysis of the effects of anthropogenic stressors on measures of human well-being.
机译:气候变化,火灾频率增加和污染等人为压力源推动了生态系统功能和复原力的转变。科学家通常依靠这些压力源的生物学指标来表明生态系统条件已经改变。但是,这些生物学指标并不总是能够直接与对人类有益的生态系统组件相关,和/或可用于评估组件健康变化(生态系统服务)的成本效益。因此,我们开发了STEPS(> ST 梳理器-> E 生态学> P 还原功能–最终生态系统> S 服务)框架将应激源生物学指标的变化与最终的生态系统服务联系起来。 STEPS框架生成了生态链的“链”,这些链探索了因压力源变化而产生的各种影响。链包括生物指标,生态生产功能(EPF;使用生态成分将生物指标链接到最终的生态系统服务)以及直接使用,欣赏或重视该成分的用户群。该框架使用定性评分(高,中,低)来描述EPF中各个组成部分之间关系的科学强度(SOS)。我们在车间环境中使用超过关键空气污染负荷的标准对STEPS框架进行了测试作为模型压力源和最终生态系统商品和服务分类系统(FEGS-CS)来描述最终生态系统服务。我们确定了对沉积物生态响应的四种模式的链:水生酸化,水生富营养化,陆地酸化和陆地富营养化。讲习班的参加者确定了183个独特的EPF,将生物学指标的变化与FEGS联系起来;当考虑到多个受益人时,我们以1104个连锁店结束。 SOS分数可以有效地确定具有最高置信度排名的链以及需要更多研究的链。 STEPS框架可以适用于应激源正在修饰生物成分的任何系统。分析结果可被社会科学界用来将评估方法应用于多个或选定的链,从而全面分析人为压力源对人类福祉的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号