首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in daily life: A comparative analysis of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the SenseWear armband
【2h】

Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in daily life: A comparative analysis of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the SenseWear armband

机译:日常生活中的体育活动和久坐行为:全球体育活动问卷(GPAQ)和SenseWear臂章的比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reduction of sedentary time and an increase in physical activity offer potential to improve public health. However, quantifying physical activity behaviour under real world conditions is a major challenge and no standard of good practice is available. Our aim was to compare the results of physical activity and sedentary behaviour obtained with a self-reported instrument (Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)) and a wearable sensor (SenseWear) in a repeated measures study design. Healthy adults (41 in Antwerp, 41 in Barcelona and 40 in London) wore the SenseWear armband for seven consecutive days and completed the GPAQ on the final day. This was repeated three times. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, Spearman correlation coefficients, mixed effects regression models and Bland-Altman plots to study agreement between both methods. Mixed models were used to assess the effect of personal characteristics on the absolute and relative difference between estimates obtained with the GPAQ and SenseWear. Moderate to vigorous energy expenditure and duration derived from the GPAQ were significantly lower (p<0.05) compared to the SenseWear, yet these variables showed significant correlations ranging from 0.45 to 0.64. Estimates of vigorous-intensity physical activity in particular showed high similarity (r>0.59). Results for sedentary behaviour did not differ, yet were poorly correlated (r<0.25). The differences between all variables were reproducible across repeated measurements. In addition, we observed a relationship between these differences and BMI, body fat and physical activity domain. Due to the lack of a standardized protocol, results from different studies measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour are difficult to compare. Therefore, we suggested an easy-to-implement approach for future studies adding the GPAQ to the wearable of choice as a basis for comparisons.
机译:减少久坐时间和增加体育锻炼为改善公共健康提供了潜力。然而,量化现实世界条件下的体育锻炼行为是一项重大挑战,并且没有良好实践的标准。我们的目的是在重复测量研究设计中比较使用自我报告的仪器(全球体育活动问卷(GPAQ))和可穿戴传感器(SenseWear)获得的体育活动和久坐行为的结果。健康的成年人(安特卫普为41,巴塞罗那为41,伦敦为40)连续7天佩戴SenseWear臂章,并在最后一天完成了GPAQ。重复三遍。我们使用Wilcoxon有符号秩和检验,Spearman相关系数,混合效应回归模型和Bland-Altman图来研究两种方法之间的一致性。混合模型用于评估个人特征对通过GPAQ和SenseWear获得的估计之间的绝对和相对差异的影响。与SenseWear相比,中度至剧烈的能量消耗和GPAQ持续时间显着降低(p <0.05),但是这些变量显示出显着的相关性,范围从0.45到0.64。剧烈运动强度的估计尤其显示出高度相似性(r> 0.59)。久坐行为的结果没有差异,但相关性很差(r <0.25)。所有变量之间的差异可在重复测量中重现。此外,我们观察到了这些差异与BMI,体脂和体育活动领域之间的关系。由于缺乏标准化的方案,很难比较测量身体活动和久坐行为的不同研究结果。因此,我们建议在将来的研究中采用一种易于实现的方法,将GPAQ添加到所选的可穿戴设备中,作为比较的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号