首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Both absolute and relative quantification of urinary mRNA are useful for non-invasive diagnosis of acute kidney allograft rejection
【2h】

Both absolute and relative quantification of urinary mRNA are useful for non-invasive diagnosis of acute kidney allograft rejection

机译:尿mRNA的绝对定量和相对定量均可用于急性肾移植排斥反应的非侵入性诊断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Urinary mRNA analysis with three-gene set (18S rRNA, CD3ε, and IP-10) has been suggested as a non-invasive biomarker of acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Application of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which has been suggested to provide higher sensitivity, accuracy, and absolute quantification without standard curves, could be a useful method for the quantifying low concentration of urinary mRNA. We investigated the urinary expression of these three genes in Korean patients with kidney transplantation and also evaluated the usefulness of ddPCR. 90 urine samples were collected at time of allograft biopsy in kidney recipients (n = 67) and from patients with stable renal function more than 10 years (n = 23). Absolute quantification with both PCR system showed significant higher mRNA levels of CD3ε and IP-10 in AR patients compared with stable transplants (STA), but there was no difference in 18S rRNA expression across the patient groups. To evaluate discrimination between AR and STA, ROC curve analyses of CTOT-4 formula yielded area under the curve values of 0.72 (95% CI 0.60–0.83) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.88) for qPCR and ddPCR, respectively. However, 18S normalization of absolute quantification and relative quantification with 18S showed better discrimination of AR from STA than those of the absolute method. Our data indicate that ddPCR system without standard curve would be useful to determine the absolute quantification of urinary mRNA from kidney transplant recipients. However, comparative method also could be useful and convenient in both qPCR and ddPCR analysis.
机译:已建议使用定量实时PCR(qPCR)在肾脏移植受体中使用三基因组(18S rRNA,CD3ε和IP-10)进行尿mRNA分析,作为急性排斥(AR)的非侵入性生物标志物。液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)的应用已被建议提供更高的灵敏度,准确性和无标准曲线的绝对定量方法,可能是定量低浓度尿mRNA的有用方法。我们调查了这三个基因在韩国肾脏移植患者中尿液的表达,并评估了ddPCR的有效性。在接受肾移植的患者(n = 67)和肾功能稳定超过10年的患者(n = 23)中,共收集了90个尿液样本。与稳定移植物(STA)相比,两种PCR系统的绝对定量均显示AR患者CD3ε和IP-10的mRNA水平显着较高,但是在各个患者组中18S rRNA表达没有差异。为了评估AR和STA之间的区别,对于qPCR和ddPCR,CTOT-4公式的ROC曲线分析得出的面积分别在曲线值0.72(95%CI 0.60-0.83)和0.77(95%CI 0.66-0.88)下。但是,绝对定量的18S归一化和18S相对定量显示,AR与STA的区别比绝对方法更好。我们的数据表明没有标准曲线的ddPCR系统将对确定肾脏移植受者尿mRNA的绝对定量很有用。但是,比较方法在qPCR和ddPCR分析中也可能是有用且方便的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号