首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >HIPPOCAMPAL SUBFIELDS ATROPHY IN ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND SEMANTIC DEMENTIA: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
【2h】

HIPPOCAMPAL SUBFIELDS ATROPHY IN ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND SEMANTIC DEMENTIA: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

机译:老年性痴呆和语义性痴呆的海马亚型萎缩症的横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Hippocampal atrophy is one of the anatomical hallmarks in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and the substrate of their episodic memory deficits. However, its specificity has been questioned since semantic dementia (SD) patients also display an atrophy of the hippocampus, but the cognitive symptoms do not include episodic memory impairments, and these patients rather manifest semantic memory deficits due to a deterioration of the anterior temporal lobes. Based on our previous finding (Chapleau et al., 2016), our hypothesis is that the posterior portion of the hippocampus is atrophied in AD patients only, and therefore explains the absence of episodic memory deficits in SD subjects.We conducted a cross-sectional study to quantify sub-hippocampal volumes in 9 SD patients, 11 AD patients and 12 controls, using the recent version of the automated segmentation software Free Surfer 6.0. The results showed that SD and AD subjects presented significant and bilateral volume differences, when compared to CTRLs, regarding whole hippocampi volumes and most sub-regions. In terms of the antero-posterior axis, the posterior regions were more atrophied in AD vs SD subjects. The hippocampal tails were bilaterally atrophied in AD compared to CTRLs, but only the left in SD, and the right fimbria was significantly smaller in AD vs CTRLs, but no difference was found in SD. While the sub-cortical results seem to confirm the pattern that has been observed in previous structural imaging studies, the results from an antero-posterior perspective seem to provide important new information.
机译:海马萎缩是阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)患者的解剖学标志之一,也是其发作性记忆缺陷的基础。然而,由于语义性痴呆(SD)患者也表现出海马萎缩,因此其特异性受到质疑,但是认知症状不包括发作性记忆障碍,并且这些患者由于前颞叶的恶化而表现出语义记忆缺陷。基于我们先前的发现(Chapleau et al。,2016),我们的假设是仅AD病人海马后部萎缩,因此解释了SD受试者中没有发作性记忆缺陷。这项研究使用最新版本的自动分段软件Free Surfer 6.0量化了9名SD患者,11名AD患者和12名对照的海马体体积。结果表明,与CTRLs相比,SD和AD受试者在整个海马体体积和大部分子区域上表现出明显的和双边的体积差异。就前后轴而言,AD组和SD组的后区萎缩程度更大。与CTRLs相比,AD的海马尾部双侧萎缩,但SD的只有左侧,AD的右侧的菌毛明显小于CTRLs,但SD的差异无统计学意义。尽管皮层下的结果似乎证实了先前结构成像研究中观察到的模式,但从前后后方的角度看,结果似乎提供了重要的新信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号