首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >COMPARING PUBLIC DISCOURSE ON ELDER CARE IN FINLAND AND THE UNITED STATES
【2h】

COMPARING PUBLIC DISCOURSE ON ELDER CARE IN FINLAND AND THE UNITED STATES

机译:比较芬兰和美国老年人护理的公共资源

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Academic literature on elder care examines the quality of care, the structure of services, and the role of non-professional care. While fairly universal across developed countries, the cultural and social welfare contexts vary suggesting cross-country differences in how these issues are understood and addressed. The media both reflects and shapes what people regard as significant and is, therefore, one place to examine cross-cultural differences in approaches to care; however, studies that compare the discourse across countries with different social welfare structures are almost non-existent. In this study, we analyze print media published in four major newspapers in Finland and the United States. Using quality of care, structure of services, and non-professional care as our guiding framework, we conducted a thematic analysis of news reports, feature stories, and editorials published during May-June 2015 and March-April 2016. Quality of care was the most common theme in Finnish media with a focus on: 1) harmful or dangerous care practices, 2) neglect or lack of care, and 3) care falling behind set quality requirements. Despite the differences in the welfare regime, cost of care to the individual was a common theme in both countries as was a focus on increasing home care and informal care. There are weak signals in both countries of innovations that co-mingle aspects of informal and formal care such as intergenerational housing, employment opportunities for older adults, and co-locating day care and adult day care centers. These tend to be based on local initiative rather than strategic, governmental planning.
机译:有关老年护理的学术文献考察了护理质量,服务结构以及非专业护理的作用。尽管在发达国家相当普遍,但文化和社会福利的背景却各不相同,这表明跨国公司在如何理解和解决这些问题方面存在差异。媒体既反映并塑造了人们认为重要的内容,因此也是检查跨文化护理方法差异的地方。但是,几乎没有关于将不同社会福利结构的国家之间的话语进行比较的研究。在这项研究中,我们分析了在芬兰和美国的四家主要报纸上发表的印刷媒体。我们以护理质量,服务结构和非专业护理为指导框架,对新闻报道,专题报道和社论于2015年5月至6月和2016年4月至4月发表的主题进行了主题分析。芬兰媒体上最常见的主题,重点是:1)有害或危险的护理习惯; 2)忽略或缺乏护理; 3)护理未达到设定的质量要求。尽管福利制度存在差异,但个人护理费用是两国共同的主题,重点是增加家庭护理和非正式护理。在这两个国家中,创新的信号微弱,它们将非正式和正式护理的各个方面混合在一起,例如代际住房,老年人的就业机会以及日托和成人日托中心的共同定位。这些往往基于当地的主动性,而不是战略性的政府计划。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    U. Koivula; A.T. Woodward;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(1),Suppl 1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 479–480
  • 总页数 2
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号