首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Supporting Third Year Medical Students Skill Acquisition and Self-Efficacy with Coping Models and Process Feedback during Laparoscopic Knot Tying Simulation
【2h】

Supporting Third Year Medical Students Skill Acquisition and Self-Efficacy with Coping Models and Process Feedback during Laparoscopic Knot Tying Simulation

机译:腹腔镜打结模拟中的应对模型和过程反馈支持三年级医学生的技能习得和自我效能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: During the third year general surgery clerkship, medical students are required to develop laparoscopic knot-tying skills. Knot-tying skills studies often rely on objective variables (e.g., time, materials used, number of iterations) that lend themselves to correlational analysis of pre- and post-intervention skill level. This study differs by examining how instructional interventions—role modeling and feedback—affect medical students' skill acquisition and self-efficacy during a laparoscopic surgical simulation training session.>Methods: Seventy-eight surgical clerkship students were assigned randomly to one cell of a 2X2 factorial design. Participants observed one of two types of role modeling (expert vs. coping) and received either process-oriented or outcome-oriented feedback during a 30-min laparoscopic training session. Participants also completed several surveys that assessed their interest in surgery and their self-efficacy for laparoscopic knot tying.>Results: Coping model groups tended to perform better on the knot tying task, though this was less the case in the presence of outcome feedback. Expert model groups slightly outperformed the coping model group on the peg transfer task, but in the presence of outcome feedback they reported the lowest satisfaction with their performance and the lowest self-efficacy for the knot tying task. The coping model combined with process feedback had a positive influence on students' efficiency in learning the task, on their satisfaction with their performance, and on their self-efficacy for laparoscopic knot typing.>Conclusions: Results are discussed relative to self-regulated learning theory.
机译:>背景:在第三年的普通外科业务期间,要求医学生发展腹腔镜打结技术。打结技能研究通常依赖于客观变量(例如时间,使用的材料,迭代次数),这些变量有助于进行干预前后技能水平的相关分析。这项研究的不同之处在于,在腹腔镜手术模拟培训课程中,考察教学干预(角色建模和反馈)如何影响医学生的技能习得和自我效能。>方法:随机分配了78名外科文员学生2X2析因设计的一个单元格。参与者观察了两种角色建模中的一种(专家与应对),并在30分钟的腹腔镜培训期间收到了面向过程或面向结果的反馈。参与者还完成了几项调查,评估了他们对手术的兴趣以及对腹腔镜打结的自我效能。>结果:应对模型组的打结任务往往表现更好,尽管在这种情况下情况并非如此。结果反馈的存在。专家模型组在桩钉转移任务上的表现稍好于应对模型组,但是在结局反馈的情况下,他们报告了对打结任务的性能满意度最低,自我效能最低。应对模型与过程反馈相结合,对学生学习任务的效率,对绩效的满意度以及对腹腔镜打结打字的自我效能有积极影响。>结论:相对于自我调节的学习理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号