首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Latent Profile and Cluster Analysis of Infant Temperament: Comparisons across Person-Centered Approaches
【2h】

Latent Profile and Cluster Analysis of Infant Temperament: Comparisons across Person-Centered Approaches

机译:婴儿气质的潜在特征和聚类分析:以人为中心的方法之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is renewed interest in person-centered approaches to understanding the structure of temperament. However, questions concerning temperament types are not frequently framed in a developmental context, especially during infancy. In addition, the most common person-centered techniques, Cluster Analysis (CA) and Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), have not been compared with respect to derived temperament types. To address these gaps, we set out to identify temperament types for younger and older infants, comparing LPA and CA techniques. Multiple data sets (N = 1,356; 672 girls, 677 boys) with maternal ratings of infant temperament obtained using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised () were combined. All infants were between 3 and 12 months of age (mean = 7.85; SD = 3.00). Due to rapid development in the first year of life, LPA and CA were performed separately for younger (n = 731; 3-to-8 months of age) and older (n = 625; 9-to-12 months of age) infants. Results supported 3-profile/cluster solutions as optimal for younger infants, and 5-profile/cluster solutions for the older subsample, indicating considerable differences between early/mid and late infancy. LPA and CA solutions produced relatively comparable types for younger and older infants. Results are discussed in the context of developmental changes unique to the end of the first year of life, which likely account for the present findings.
机译:人们开始以人为中心的方法来了解气质的结构。但是,关于气质类型的问题并不经常在发展的背景下提出,尤其是在婴儿期。此外,还没有针对派生的气质类型对最常见的以人为中心的技术进行聚类分析(CA)和潜在特征分析(LPA)。为了解决这些差距,我们着手比较LPA和CA技术,以识别年龄较小的婴儿的气质类型。合并了多个数据集(N = 1,356; 672个女孩,677个男孩),这些数据使用婴儿行为问卷修订版()进行了孕产妇气质的母亲评分。所有婴儿均在3到12个月大之间(平均= 7.85; SD = 3.00)。由于生命的第一年迅速发展,LPA和CA分别针对年龄较小(n = 731; 3至8个月大)和年龄较大(n = 625; 9至12个月大)的婴儿进行。结果支持3轮廓/集群解决方案最适合婴儿,而5轮廓/集群解决方案则适合较早的子样本,这表明婴儿早期/中期和晚期存在显着差异。 LPA和CA解决方案为年龄较大的婴儿提供了相对可比的类型。在生命的第一年末独特的发展变化的背景下讨论了结果,这很可能解释了当前的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号