首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms
【2h】

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms

机译:三种当前无症状胰腺囊性肿瘤评估指南的诊断准确性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Asymptomatic pancreatic cysts are a common clinical problem but only a minority of these cases progress to cancer. Our aim was to compare the accuracy to detect malignancy of the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), the 2012 International Consensus/Fukuoka (Fukuoka guidelines [FG]), and the 2010 American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines.We conducted a retrospective study at 3 referral centers for all patients who underwent resection for an asymptomatic pancreatic cyst between January 2008 and December 2013. We compared the accuracy of 3 guidelines in predicting high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer in resected cysts. We performed logistic regression analyses to examine the association between cyst features and risk of HGD or cancer.A total of 269 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 228 (84.8%) had a benign diagnosis or low-grade dysplasia on surgical pathology, and 41 patients (15.2%) had either HGD (n = 14) or invasive cancer (n = 27). Of the 41 patients with HGD or cancer on resection, only 3 patients would have met the AGA guideline's indications for resection based on the preoperative cyst characteristics, whereas 30/41 patients would have met the FG criteria for resection and 22/41 patients met the ACR criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of HGD, and/or cancer of the AGA guidelines were 7.3%, 88.2%, 10%, and 84.1%, compared to 73.2%, 45.6%, 19.5%, and 90.4% for the FG and 53.7%, 61%, 19.8%, and 88% for the ACR guidelines. In multivariable analysis, cyst size >3 cm, compared to ≤3 cm, (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11, 4.2) and each year increase in age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03, 1.11) were positively associated with risk of HGD or cancer on resection.In patients with asymptomatic branch duct-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms or mucinous cystic neoplasms who underwent resection, the prevalence rate of HGD or cancer was 15.2%. Using the 2015 AGA criteria for resection would have missed 92.6% of patients with HGD or cancer. The more “inclusive” FG and ACR had a higher sensitivity for HGD or cancer but lower specificity. Given the current deficiencies of these guidelines, it will be important to determine the acceptable rate of false-positives in order to prevent a single true-positive.
机译:无症状的胰腺囊肿是常见的临床问题,但这些病例中只有少数会发展为癌症。我们的目的是比较2015年美国胃肠病学协会(AGA),2012年国际共识/福冈(Fukuoka指南[FG])和2010年美国放射学院(ACR)指南检测恶性肿瘤的准确性。在3个转诊中心进行的这项研究针对所有在2008年1月至2013年12月之间接受无症状胰腺囊肿切除的患者进行了研究。我们比较了3条指南在预测切除的囊肿中的高度不典型增生(HGD)或癌症中的准确性。我们进行了Logistic回归分析以检查囊肿特征与HGD或癌症风险之间的关联。总共269例患者符合纳入标准。总共228例(84.8%)的手术病理诊断为良性或低度不典型增生,41例(15.2%)患有HGD(n = 14)或浸润性癌(n = 27)。在41例切除了HGD或癌症的患者中,只有3例符合术前囊肿特征符合AGA指南的切除指征,而30/41例符合FG切除标准,而22/41例符合切除术。 ACR标准。 AGA指南对HGD和/或癌症的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值分别为7.3%,88.2%,10%和84.1%,而73.2%,45.6%,19.5%和90.4 FG为%,ACR准则为53.7%,61%,19.8%和88%。在多变量分析中,囊肿大小> 3 cm,而≤3cm,(优势比[OR] = 2.08,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.11,4.2),并且年龄逐年增加(OR = 1.07,95% CI = 1.03,1.11)与切除的HGD或癌症风险呈正相关。在无症状分支导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤或黏液性囊性肿瘤切除的患者中,HGD或癌症的患病率为15.2%。如果采用2015年AGA切除标准,则将有92.6%的HGD或癌症患者错过。更具“包容性”的FG和ACR对HGD或癌症的敏感性较高,但特异性较低。考虑到这些指南当前的不足,确定假阳性的可接受率对于防止单个真阳性很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号