首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Differential Impact of State Tobacco Control Policies on Cessation Treatment Utilization Across Established Tobacco Disparities Groups
【2h】

The Differential Impact of State Tobacco Control Policies on Cessation Treatment Utilization Across Established Tobacco Disparities Groups

机译:国家烟草控制政策对既定烟草差异群体对戒烟处理利用的不同影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Tobacco control policies are effective in promoting quit attempts and increase the likelihood that smokers use evidence-based cessation treatments (e.g., nicotine replacement therapies (NRT), non-NRT medications, behavioral treatment, and/or quitlines). However, what is less clear is how these policies might differentially impact different groups of smokers, perhaps in some cases even widening disparities in the use of evidence-based tobacco dependence treatments. This paper examined how different state-level tobacco control policies impact the use of evidence-based cessation treatments by race/ethnicity, gender, socio-economic status (SES), age, and smoking history. Participants included 9,110 adult smokers reporting a past-year quit attempt within the 2010–2011 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey. Lasso regression modeling was used to identify a subset of interactions between tobacco policies and individual smoker characteristics that predicted use of evidence-based cessation treatment. Significant interactions were fitted via participant-weighted generalized linear models to determine effect sizes and relations to each cessation treatment outcome. Results highlighted that various state level tobacco control policies differentially impacted the reported use of both prescription and non-prescription stop smoking medications by race/ethnicity, age, and SES. The relationship between state level tobacco control policies and the use of behavioral treatments and quitlines did not differ by smoker characteristics. In sum, tobacco control policies differentially impact the use of FDA approved stop smoking medications across different race/ethnicity, age, and SES groups. Understanding such effects can help to target interventions to ensure equal access to evidence-based tobacco dependence treatments.
机译:烟草控制政策可有效促进戒烟尝试,并增加吸烟者使用循证戒烟治疗的可能性(例如,尼古丁替代疗法(NRT),非NRT药物,行为治疗和/或戒烟热线)。但是,还不清楚的是这些政策如何对不同的吸烟者产生不同的影响,在某些情况下,甚至可能扩大使用循证烟草依赖疗法的差距。本文通过种族/民族,性​​别,社会经济地位(SES),年龄和吸烟史,研究了不同的州级烟草控制政策如何影响基于证据的戒烟治疗的使用。参与者包括9,110名成年吸烟者,他们在《当前人口调查》的2010-2011年烟草使用补遗中报告了过去一年的戒烟尝试。套索回归模型用于确定烟草政策与个体吸烟者特征之间相互作用的子集,这些相互作用预测了基于证据的戒烟治疗的使用。通过参与者加权广义线性模型拟合重大相互作用,以确定效应量和与每种戒烟治疗结局的关系。结果突出表明,各州级别的烟草控制政策对种族/族裔,年龄和SES的报道使用处方和非处方戒烟药物有不同的影响。州级烟草控制政策与行为治疗和戒烟方法的使用之间的关系在吸烟者特征方面没有差异。总而言之,烟草控制政策对不同种族/民族,年龄和SES组的FDA批准的戒烟药物的使用产生不同的影响。了解此类影响可以帮助确定干预措施,以确保平等获得基于证据的烟草依赖治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号