首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Does the Effort of Processing Potential Incentives Influence the Adaption of Context Updating in Older Adults?
【2h】

Does the Effort of Processing Potential Incentives Influence the Adaption of Context Updating in Older Adults?

机译:处理潜在奖励措施的努力是否会影响老年人的情境更新适应?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A number of aging studies suggest that older adults process positive and negative information differently. For instance, the socioemotional selectivity theory postulates that older adults preferably process positive information in service of emotional well-being (). Moreover, recent research has started to investigate whether incentives like gains or losses can influence cognitive control in an ongoing task. In an earlier study (), we examined whether incentive cues, indicating potential monetary gains, losses, or neutral outcomes for good performance in the following trial, would influence older adults’ ability to exert cognitive control. Cognitive control was measured in an AX-Continuous-Performance-Task (AX-CPT) in which participants had to select their responses to probe stimuli depending on a preceding context cue. In this study, we did not find support for a positivity effect in older adults, but both gains and losses led to enhanced context processing. As the trial-wise presentation mode may be too demanding on cognitive resources for such a bias to occur, the main goal of the present study was to examine whether motivational mindsets, induced by block-wise presentation of incentives, would result in a positivity effect. For this reason, we examined 17 older participants (65–76 years) in the AX-CPT using a block-wise presentation of incentive cues and compared them to 18 older adults (69–78 years) with the trial-wise presentation mode from our earlier study (). Event-related potentials were recorded to the onset of the motivational cue and during the AX-CPT. Our results show that (a) older adults initially process cues signaling potential losses more strongly, but later during the AX-CPT invest more cognitive resources in preparatory processes like context updating in conditions with potential gains, and (b) block-wise and trial-wise presentation of incentive cues differentially influenced cognitive control. When incentives were presented block-wise, the above described valence effects were consistently found. In contrast, when incentives were presented trial-wise, the effects were mixed and salience as well as valence effects can be obtained. Hence, how positive and negative incentive cues influence cognitive control in older adults is dependent on demands of cue processing.
机译:许多衰老研究表明,老年人对正信息和负信息的处理方式不同。例如,社会情感选择性理论假设,老年人最好处理正面信息,以服务于情感幸福感()。此外,最近的研究已经开始调查诸如得失之类的激励措施是否会影响正在进行的任务中的认知控制。在较早的研究()中,我们研究了在接下来的试验中,表明潜在的金钱收益,损失或中立结果的激励线索是否会影响老年人发挥认知控制的能力。认知控制是在AX连续性任务(AX-CPT)中进行测量的,参与者必须根据先前的上下文提示来选择自己的反应以探测刺激。在这项研究中,我们没有发现对老年人的积极作用有任何支持,但是得失都导致上下文处理的增强。由于试行方式的表达方式可能对认知资源的要求太高,以至于无法产生这种偏见,因此本研究的主要目标是检验由激励措施的逐级呈现引起的动机思维方式是否会导致积极效果。由于这个原因,我们使用逐组激励线索检查了AX-CPT中的17名年龄较大的参与者(65-76岁),并将他们与18名年龄较大的成年人(69-78岁)进行了比较,采用了我们之前的研究()。在AX-CPT期间,将与事件相关的电位记录到动机提示的开始。我们的结果表明(a)老年人最初处理暗示潜在损失的线索更为强烈,但是后来在AX-CPT期间,在准备过程中投入了更多的认知资源,例如在具有潜在收益的情况下进行情境更新,以及(b)逐块进行和试验提示的明智表达方式对认知控制有不同的影响。当激励被逐块提出时,上述化合价效应被一致地发现。相反,当试验性地提出激励措施时,效果是混合的,并且可以获得显着性和效价效应。因此,正面和负面激励线索如何影响老年人的认知控制取决于线索处理的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号