首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Beyond Open Communication: A Call for Partnership Between Clinical Ethics and Research Ethics Committees
【2h】

Beyond Open Communication: A Call for Partnership Between Clinical Ethics and Research Ethics Committees

机译:超越开放式交流:呼吁临床伦理学与研究伦理学委员会之间建立伙伴关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In proposing strategies to improve access to and quality of research ethics consultation (REC) services, call for “open communication” between REC and clinical ethics consultation (CEC) services. The authors believe this proposal provides a means for addressing ethical issues occurring at the intersection of research and clinical care, as well as an opportunity for REC services to learn from quality improvement strategies of CEC services. We agree with the premises of this suggestion, yet propose that direct partnership, rather than simply open communication, between REC and CEC services can provide further benefits, including protecting patient-subjects, improving the quality of research ethics consultations, and increasing the visibility of REC services.
机译:在提出改善研究伦理咨询(REC)服务的获取和质量的策略时,要求REC与临床伦理咨询(CEC)服务之间进行“开放式交流”。作者认为,该提议为解决研究和临床护理交叉出现的伦理问题提供了一种手段,并且为REC服务提供了从CEC服务质量改进策略中学习的机会。我们同意该建议的前提,但建议REC和CEC服务之间的直接合作关系,而不是简单的开放式沟通,可以提供进一步的收益,包括保护患者受试者,提高研究伦理咨询的质量以及提高REC服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号