首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Support amongst UK pig farmers and agricultural stakeholders for the use of food losses in animal feed
【2h】

Support amongst UK pig farmers and agricultural stakeholders for the use of food losses in animal feed

机译:支持英国养猪户和农业利益相关者利用动物饲料中的食物损失

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While food losses (foods which were intended for human consumption, but which ultimately are not directly eaten by people) have been included in animal feed for millennia, the practice is all but banned in the European Union. Amid recent calls to promote a circular economy, we conducted a survey of pig farmers (n = 82) and other agricultural stakeholders (n = 81) at a UK agricultural trade fair on their attitudes toward the use of food losses in pig feed, and the potential relegalisation of swill (the use of cooked food losses as feed). While most respondents found the use of feeds containing animal by-products or with the potential for intra-species recycling (i.e. pigs eating pork products) to be less acceptable than feeds without, we found strong support (>75%) for the relegalisation of swill among both pig farmers and other stakeholders. We fit multi-hierarchical Bayesian models to understand people’s position on the relegalisation of swill, finding that respondents who were concerned about disease control and the perception of the pork industry supported relegalisation less, while people who were concerned with farm financial performance and efficiency or who thought that swill would benefit the environment and reduce trade-deficits, were more supportive. Our results provide a baseline estimate of support amongst the large-scale pig industry for the relegalisation of swill, and suggest that proponents for its relegalisation must address concerns about disease control and the consumer acceptance of swill-fed pork.
机译:几千年来,虽然粮食损失(原本是供人食用的食物,但最终并未直接被人食用)已被包括在动物饲料中,但欧盟几乎禁止这种做法。在最近呼吁促进循环经济的呼吁中,我们在英国农业贸易展览会上对养猪户(n = 82)和其他农业利益相关者(n = 81)进行了一项调查,调查他们对使用猪饲料中食物损失的态度,以及s水的潜在合法化(使用损失的熟食作为饲料)。虽然大多数受访者发现使用含有动物副产品或具有种内回收潜力(即食用猪肉产品的猪)的饲料比没有饲料的可接受性低,但我们发现大力支持(> 75%)的合法化养猪户和其他利益相关者之间的s割。我们采用多层次的贝叶斯模型来了解人们对遗嘱合法化的立场,发现关注疾病控制和对猪肉行业看法的受访者对合法化的支持较少,而关注农场财务绩效和效率的人或认为废纸将有益于环境并减少贸易逆差,更具支持性。我们的结果提供了对大型猪肉行业中将水will合法化的支持的基线估计,并建议将其合法化的支持者必须解决疾病控制和消费者对水will饲猪肉的接受度的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号