首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Characterizing the Corticomotor Connectivity of the Bilateral Ankle Muscles during Rest and Isometric Contraction in Healthy Adults
【2h】

Characterizing the Corticomotor Connectivity of the Bilateral Ankle Muscles during Rest and Isometric Contraction in Healthy Adults

机译:在健康成年人的休息和等距收缩过程中表征双侧踝肌肉的皮质运动连通性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The investigation of the corticomotor connectivity (CMC) to leg muscles is an emerging research area, and establishing reliability of measures is critical. This study examined the measurement reliability and the differences between bilateral soleus (SOL) and tibialis anterior (TA) CMC in 21 neurologically intact adults. Using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), each muscle’s CMC was assessed twice (7 ± 2 days apart) during rest and active conditions. CMC was quantified using a standardized battery of eight measures (4/condition): resting motor threshold (RMT) during resting, motor evoked potential amplitude and latency (raw and normalized to height) in both conditions, contralateral silent period (CSP) during active. Using two reliability metrics (intraclass correlation coefficient and coefficient of variation of method error; good reliability: ≥0.75 and ≤15, respectively) and repeated-measures ANOVA, we investigated the reliability and Muscle X Body Side interaction. For both muscles, RMT, resting raw and normalized latencies, and active raw latency demonstrated good reliability, while CSP had good reliability only for TA. Amplitude did not demonstrate good reliability for both muscles. SOL CMC were significantly different from TA CMC for all measures but CSP; body side had no significant effect. Therefore, only certain measures may reliably quantify SOL and TA CMC while different CMC (except CSP) between SOL and TA suggests dissimilar corticospinal drive to each muscle regardless of the side.
机译:皮质运动与腿部肌肉的连接性(CMC)的研究是一个新兴的研究领域,建立可靠的措施至关重要。这项研究检查了21位神经学完整的成年人的测量可靠性以及双侧比目鱼(SOL)和胫骨前(TA)CMC之间的差异。使用单脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS),在休息和活跃状态下对每只肌肉的CMC进行两次评估(相隔7±2天)。使用八项测量值(4个/条件)的标准化电池对CMC进行量化:静止期间的静止运动阈值(RMT),两种情况下运动诱发的电位幅度和潜伏期(原始和归一化为高度),活动期间的对侧静默期(CSP) 。使用两个可靠性指标(类内相关系数和方法误差的变异系数;良好的可靠性:分别≥0.75和≤15)和重复测量方差分析,我们研究了可靠性和肌肉X体侧相互作用。对于两种肌肉,RMT,静息原始和标准时延以及主动原始潜伏期均显示出良好的可靠性,而CSP仅对TA具有良好的可靠性。振幅未显示出对两条肌肉的良好可靠性。 SOL CMC与TA CMC相比,除CSP以外的其他所有度量都有显着差异。体侧无明显影响。因此,只有某些措施才能可靠地对SOL和TA CMC进行量化,而SOL和TA之间的不同CMC(CSP除外)则表明,不管侧面如何,皮质脊髓对每个肌肉的驱动不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号