首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Parallel Tests Using Culture Xpert MTB/RIF and SAT-TB in Sputum Plus Bronchial Alveolar Lavage Fluid Significantly Increase Diagnostic Performance of Smear-Negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis
【2h】

Parallel Tests Using Culture Xpert MTB/RIF and SAT-TB in Sputum Plus Bronchial Alveolar Lavage Fluid Significantly Increase Diagnostic Performance of Smear-Negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis

机译:在痰液加支气管肺泡灌洗液中使用培养物Xpert MTB / RIF和SAT-TB进行的平行检测可显着提高涂片阴性肺结核的诊断性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

At present, tuberculosis remains a serious threat to human health. The diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is still difficult, and the prominent challenge for diagnosis is the lack of a highly sensitive and specific method. In order to explore the diagnostic value of parallel tests, this study prospectively enrolled 258 patients with smear-negative PTB from May 2, 2015 to December 31, 2016. The sputum specimens and bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples from all patients were assessed for MTB detection by culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and simultaneous amplification and testing method for TB (SAT-TB). Overall, the sensitivity of any single test using culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, or SAT-TB was lower than that for parallel tests (p < 0.05), and the sensitivity rates for MTB detection in BALF were significantly higher than those in sputum samples. There were lower agreements in the detection results between sputum samples and BALF for all tests (p < 0.05). The parallel tests models of using culture plus Xpert MTB/RIF plus SAT-TB, culture plus Xpert, or culture plus SAT-TB achieved higher sensitivities compared with all three single test models (p < 0.05). Additionally, joint detection using sputum and BALF samples achieved a high sensitivity (0.8566, 95% CI: 0.8086–0.8941). In conclusion, the parallel tests model using culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and SAT-TB in sputum plus BALF significantly increases the diagnostic performance of smear-negative PTB; thus, this method should be applied clinically when PTB is suspected but smear results are negative.
机译:目前,结核病仍然是对人类健康的严重威胁。肺结核(PTB)的诊断仍然很困难,并且诊断的主要挑战是缺乏高度敏感和特异的方法。为了探讨平行试验的诊断价值,本研究从2015年5月2日至2016年12月31日共纳入258例涂片阴性PTB患者。评估了所有患者的痰标本和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)样本用于通过培养检测MTB,Xpert MTB / RIF以及同时进行的结核病扩增和检测方法(SAT-TB)。总体而言,使用培养物,Xpert MTB / RIF或SAT-TB进行的任何单一检测的敏感性均低于平行检测(p <0.05),并且BALF中MTB检测的敏感性明显高于痰液样本。在所有测试中,痰液样本与BALF的检测结果之间的一致性较低(p <0.05)。与所有三个单一测试模型相比,使用培养物+ Xpert MTB / RIF + SAT-TB,培养物+ Xpert或培养物+ SAT-TB的并行测试模型获得了更高的灵敏度(p <0.05)。此外,使用痰液和BALF样品进行联合检测具有很高的灵敏度(0.8566,95%CI:0.8086–0.8941)。总之,在痰液和BALF中使用培养物,Xpert MTB / RIF和SAT-TB进行的平行测试模型显着提高了涂片阴性PTB的诊断性能。因此,当怀疑有PTB但涂片结果为阴性时,应在临床上应用此方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号