首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
【2h】

Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer

机译:11C-胆碱正电子发射断层显像/计算机断层显像(PET / CT)与常规成像检测复发性前列腺癌的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We aimed to compare 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with conventional imaging, including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography (CT), and bone scintigraphy, for prostate cancer restaging. Thirty patients (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA: 11.8 ng/mL]) with suspected recurrent prostate cancer following definitive treatment underwent 11C-choline PET/CT and conventional imaging, including pelvic MRI, contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT, and bone scintigraphy. The results were compared with regard to patient- and lesion-based diagnostic performance for local recurrence, and for lymph node and bony metastases using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar’s test. Documented local recurrence and node and bony metastases were present in 11 (36.7%), 10 (33.3%), and 17 (56.7%) cases, respectively, of the enrolled patients. Patient-based sensitivity / specificity / accuracy / area under the ROC curve for 11C-choline-PET/CT for diagnosing local recurrence were 90.9% / 94.7% / 93.3% / 0.975 and for conventional imaging were 90.9% / 100% / 96.7% / 1.0. Those who underwent 11C-choline-PET/CT for node metastasis were 90.0% / 95.0% / 93.3% / 0.925 and for conventional imaging were 70.0% / 95.0% / 86.7% / 0.905. Those who underwent 11C-choline-PET/CT for bone metastasis were 94.1% / 92.3% / 93.3% / 0.991 and who underwent conventional imaging were 94.1% / 84.6% / 90.0% / 0.982. No significant differences were observed among them. The lesion-based detection rate of 11C-choline PET/CT for local recurrences and node and bone metastases as compared to conventional imaging was 92.9% (13/14) vs. 92.9% (13/14); 87.1% (27/31) vs. 54.8% (17/31); and 96.9% (219/226) vs. 90.3% (204/226) respectively, with significant differences noted for detection of node and bone lesions (p=0.0044 and p=0.00030, respectively). 11C-choline-PET/CT is more accurate in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer nodes and bony metastatic lesions compared to conventional imaging and has the advantage of restaging the disease in a single step.
机译:我们的目的是比较 11 C-胆碱正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET / CT)与常规成像,包括盆腔磁共振成像(MRI),对比增强胸部,腹部和盆腔计算机断层扫描(CT)和骨闪烁显像,用于前列腺癌分期。对30例最终治疗后疑似复发性前列腺癌的患者(中位前列腺特异性抗原[PSA:11.8 ng / mL])进行了 11 C-胆碱PET / CT和常规成像,包括盆腔MRI,造影剂增强胸部,腹部和骨盆CT以及骨闪烁显像。使用接收器工作特征(ROC)分析和McNemar检验,比较了基于患者和病变的局部复发诊断性能以及淋巴结和骨转移的诊断结果。记录在案的局部复发以及淋巴结转移和骨转移分别在11例(36.7%),10例(33.3%)和17例(56.7%)的患者中出现。基于患者的 11 C-胆碱-PET / CT诊断局部复发的敏感性/特异性/准确度/ ROC曲线下面积分别为90.9%/ 94.7%/ 93.3%/ 0.975和常规影像学检查90.9%/ 100%/ 96.7%/ 1.0。接受 11 C-胆碱-PET / CT结节转移的患者为90.0%/ 95.0%/ 93.3%/ 0.925,而常规成像的患者为70.0%/ 95.0%/ 86.7%/ 0.905。进行 11 C-胆碱-PET / CT骨转移的患者分别为94.1%/ 92.3%/ 93.3%/ 0.991,而接受常规影像学检查的患者为94.1%/ 84.6%/ 90.0%/ 0.982。在它们之间没有观察到显着差异。与传统成像相比, 11 C-胆碱PET / CT对局部复发以及淋巴结和骨转移的基于病变的检出率分别为92.9%(13/14)和92.9%(13/14) ); 87.1%(27/31)对54.8%(17/31);分别为96.9%(219/226)和90.3%(204/226),发现淋巴结和骨病变的差异显着(分别为p = 0.0044和p = 0.00030)。与常规成像相比, 11 C-胆碱-PET / CT在检测复发性前列腺癌淋巴结和骨转移性病变方面更准确,并且具有一步重现疾病的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号