首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Weight of Emotions in Decision-Making: How Fearful and Happy Facial Stimuli Modulate Action Readiness of Goal-Directed Actions
【2h】

The Weight of Emotions in Decision-Making: How Fearful and Happy Facial Stimuli Modulate Action Readiness of Goal-Directed Actions

机译:决策过程中的情绪分量:恐惧和快乐的面部刺激如何调节目标导向动作的动作准备

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Modern theories of behavioral control converge with the idea that goal-directed/voluntary behaviors are intimately tied to the evaluation of resources. Of key relevance in the decision-making processes that underlie action selection are those stimuli that bear emotional content. However, even though it is acknowledged that emotional information affects behavioral control, the exact way in which emotions impact on action planning is largely unknown. To clarify this issue, I gave an emotional version of a goo-go task to healthy participants, in which they had to perform the same arm reaching movement when pictures of fearful or happy faces were presented, and to withhold it when pictures of faces with neutral expressions were presented. This task allows for the investigation of the effects of emotional stimuli when they are task-relevant without conflating movement planning with target detection and task switching. It was found that both the reaction times (RTs) and the percentages of errors increased when the go-signal was the image of a fearful looking face, as opposed to when the go-signal was a happy looking face. Importantly, to control for the role of the features of the stimuli, I ran a control task in which the same pictures were shown; however, participants had to move/withhold the commanded movement according to gender, disregarding the emotional valence. In this context, the differences between RTs and error percentages between the fearful and happy faces disappeared. On the one hand, these results suggest that fearful facial stimuli are likely to capture and hold attention more strongly than faces that express happiness, which could serve to increase vigilance for detecting a potential threat in an observer’s environment. On the other hand, they also suggest that the influence of fearful facial stimuli is not automatic, but it depends on the task requirements.
机译:现代的行为控制理论与目标导向/自愿行为与资源评估紧密相关的观点相融合。在行动选择基础上的决策过程中与那些具有情感满足感的刺激具有关键意义。但是,尽管人们已经认识到情绪信息会影响行为控制,但情绪对行动计划的影响的确切方式还是未知之数。为了弄清这个问题,我给健康的参与者一个情感的去/不去任务版本,当参与者呈现恐惧或高兴的表情时,他们必须执行相同的伸臂动作,而当参与者的图像出现时,则保持不动。提出了具有中性表情的面孔。此任务允许在与任务相关时调查情绪刺激的效果,而无需将运动计划与目标检测和任务切换相混淆。结果发现,当go信号是一张令人恐惧的表情的图像时,与go信号是一张高兴的表情的图像相比,反应时间(RTs)和错误百分比都增加了。重要的是,为了控制刺激特征的作用,我执行了一个控制任务,其中显示了相同的图片。但是,参与者必须根据性别移动/保留命令的动作,而忽略情感价。在这种情况下,恐惧和快乐面孔之间的RT和错误百分比之间的差异消失了。一方面,这些结果表明,与表达快乐的面孔相比,恐惧的面部刺激更有可能吸引并吸引注意力,这可能有助于提高警惕,以发现观察者环境中的潜在威胁。另一方面,他们还认为,可怕的面部刺激的影响不是自动的,而是取决于任务要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号