首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Occupational Therapy Self-Efficacy Well-Being in Older Adults Living in Residential Care Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
【2h】

Occupational Therapy Self-Efficacy Well-Being in Older Adults Living in Residential Care Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:居住在住宿设施中的老年人的职业治疗自我效能和幸福感:一项随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Introduction: Choosing the type of treatment approach is as important as the treatment itself, also giving and important value to internal variables in the individual that can determine the evolution of the intervention. The main aim of this study is to determine whether individual and/or group occupational therapy leads to changes in generalized self-efficacy and psychological well-being, and to identify the type of therapy that has the best effects on older adults.>Method: Prospective, randomized, comparing two treatment groups: individual and group therapy during 6 months. A total sample of 70 patients institutionalized in residential care homes for older adults with a mean age of 85 (SD = 4). Assessment was conducted using the General Self-Efficacy Scale and Ryff’s Well-being Scale. For analyze the main dependent variables we used ANOVA for intra-subject and inter-subject factors and Pearson correlation between well-being and self-efficacy by type of treatment.>Results: Groups were equivalent at baseline. The results show statistically significant differences between the two types of therapy, showing a positive correlation between well-being and self-efficacy, being greater at a group level than at and individual level. At the group level, practically all of variables measured in the participants were increased as shown in the results tables, including a better adaptation and predisposition to work four participants died while the study was being conducted.>Conclusion: The clinical trial shows that older people in residential centers achieve an increase in emotional well-being and self-efficacy when they receive occupational therapy group, rather than individual treatment not being significant changes. Treatment group participants reported a positive experience and clinical benefits from training program.The clinical trial was registered in the U.S. National Institutes of Health () with identifier.
机译:>简介:选择治疗方法的类型与治疗本身一样重要,并且对个体的内部变量具有重要价值,这些变量可以确定干预措施的发展。这项研究的主要目的是确定个人和/或团体职业治疗是否会导致普遍的自我效能和心理健康的变化,并确定对老年人影响最大的治疗类型。>方法:前瞻性,随机比较两个治疗组:六个月内的个体治疗和小组治疗。共有70位患者在养老院住院,平均年龄为85岁(SD = 4)。使用一般自我效能感量表和Ryff的幸福感量表进行评估。为了分析主要因变量,我们使用ANOVA进行受试者内和受试者间因素以及幸福感和自我效能之间的皮尔逊相关性(按治疗类型分类)。>结果:各组在基线时是等效的。结果显示两种疗法之间在统计学上有显着差异,表明幸福感和自我效能之间呈正相关,在团体水平上大于个人水平。在小组一级,实际上,如结果表所示,增加了参与者测量的所有变量,包括在进行研究时更好地适应和倾向于工作的四个参与者死亡。>结论:临床试验表明,居住中心的老年人在接受职业治疗组后,情绪健康和自我效能得到提高,而不是个体治疗没有明显变化。治疗组参与者报告说该培训计划具有积极的经验和临床益处。该临床试验已在美国国立卫生研究院()进行了注册,并带有标识符。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号