首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Validation of same-day bowel preparation regimen using 4L polyethylene glycol
【2h】

Validation of same-day bowel preparation regimen using 4L polyethylene glycol

机译:使用4升聚乙二醇验证当日肠道准备方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A split-dose regimen is the recommended method of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. However, for colonoscopy performed in the afternoon, same-day preparation is recommended rather than a split-dose regimen. No study has compared the efficacy of same-day bowel-cleansing for morning colonoscopy (MC) and afternoon colonoscopy (AC). The aims of this study were to evaluate the bowel-cleansing efficacy, adverse events, and patient tolerability of same-day bowel preparation for colonoscopy using 4L polyethylene glycol (PEG).The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy at our healthcare center over 3 months were retrospectively reviewed. Colonoscopy was performed between 10:00 and 16:00. Study subjects were assigned to the MC or AC group according to their colonoscopy start time (MC group, before 12:00; AC group, after 12:00). Study subjects were instructed to drink 500-mL PEG every 15 minutes. In the MC group, bowel cleansing was started at 05:00 and finished at 07:00. For the AC group, 2L PEG was consumed from 07:00, and the remaining 2L PEG was started 3 hours before colonoscopy. The composite safety profile included vital signs, laboratory test results, and questionnaire findings. Laboratory testing of subjects and completion of the questionnaire were performed before colonoscopy. The questionnaire asked about adverse events and tolerability of the bowel cleansing regimen. Bowel-cleansing efficacy was assessed using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS). Bowel-cleansing efficacy, tolerability, and safety profile were compared between the 2 groups.Two hundred and ninety-one subjects were included (MC group, 169; AC group, 122).The BBPS did not differ between the 2 groups (7.3 ± 0.8 vs. 7.3 ± 0.8, P = .68). There were no instances of electrolyte imbalance or hemodynamic instability in either group. The tolerability of the bowel-cleansing regimen did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .59).The bowel-cleansing efficacy, safety profile, and patient tolerability of MC and AC were comparable. A same-day dose of 4L PEG is a feasible bowel preparation method.
机译:分剂量方案是肠镜检查的肠道准备方法。但是,对于下午进行的结肠镜检查,建议当天准备,而不是分剂量方案。尚无研究比较当天清肠对早晨结肠镜检查(MC)和下午结肠镜检查(AC)的疗效。这项研究的目的是评估使用4L聚乙二醇(PEG)进行结肠镜检查的当日肠道准备的肠道清洁功效,不良事件和患者的耐受性。回顾性分析3个月。结肠镜检查在10:00至16:00之间进行。根据研究对象的结肠镜检查开始时间将其分为MC组或AC组(MC组为12:00之前; AC组为12:00之后)。指示研究对象每15分钟喝500 mL PEG。在MC组中,肠清洗从05:00开始,并在07:00完成。对于AC组,从07:00开始消耗2L PEG,其余2L PEG在结肠镜检查前3小时开始服用。综合安全性资料包括生命体征,实验室测试结果和问卷调查结果。在结肠镜检查之前对受试者进行实验室测试并完成问卷调查。该问卷询问了肠清洗方案的不良事件和耐受性。使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估肠道清洁功效。比较两组的肠道清洁效果,耐受性和安全性,其中包括211名受试者(MC组169; AC组122),两组之间的BBPS无差异(7.3± 0.8对7.3±±0.8,P = 0.68)。两组均未出现电解质失衡或血液动力学不稳定的情况。两组的肠清洁方案的耐受性没有差异(P = .59).MC和AC的肠清洁功效,安全性以及患者耐受性相当。当日剂量的4L PEG是可行的肠道制备方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号