首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Correlations of DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score with the extent of coronary stenosis in acute coronary syndrome
【2h】

Correlations of DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score with the extent of coronary stenosis in acute coronary syndrome

机译:急性冠脉综合征中DAPT评分和PRECISE-DAPT评分与冠状动脉狭窄程度的相关性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score and PRECISE-DAPT score were recommended for decision making of optimal DAPT in discriminating the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. But the relationships between 2 scoring tools with the extent of coronary stenosis have not been established.We retrospectively enrolled 359 patients of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who received percutaneous coronary intervention. Both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score were calculated, and patients were divided by their recommended cut-offs. Gensini score and triple-vessel disease (3-VD) were chosen to evaluate the severity of coronary stenosis.Overall, 54.9% and 10.0% of the patients had higher DAPT score (≥2) or PRECISE-DAPT score (≥25). Patients with higher DAPT score had increased stent counts, total length of stents, Gensini score, and proportion of 3-VD, but decreased minimum diameter of stent. But these differences were not found in PRECISE-DAPT subgroups. When divided into quartiles of both scoring systems, the highest Gensini score and proportions of 3-VD were found in the fourth quartile of both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score. Moreover, both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score were independent risk factors of Gensini score after adjustment (P < .001 and P = .047). Furthermore, an increase of 1 point of DAPT score and 5 points of PRECISE-DAPT score resulted by 51% (odds ratios [OR]: 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.19–1.91, P = .001) and 34% (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11–1.62, P = .003) increase in risk of 3-VD after adjustment.Both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score were independently associated with the degree of coronary stenosis in patients with ACS.
机译:建议使用双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)评分和PRECISE-DAPT评分来决定最佳DAPT,以区分血栓形成和出血风险。但尚无2种评分工具与冠状动脉狭窄程度之间的关系。我们回顾性研究了359例接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者。计算DAPT分数和PRECISE-DAPT分数,然后将患者除以建议的临界值。选择Gensini评分和三支血管病变(3-VD)评估冠状动脉狭窄的严重程度,总体而言,分别有54.9%和10.0%的患者具有较高的DAPT评分(≥2)或PRECISE-DAPT评分(≥25)。 DAPT得分较高的患者支架数目增加,支架总长度,Gensini得分和3-VD的比例增加,但最小支架直径减小。但是,在PRECISE-DAPT子组中未发现这些差异。当分为两个评分系统的四分位数时,在DAPT得分和PRECISE-DAPT得分的第四个四分位数中,Gensini得分最高,而3-VD的比例最高。此外,调整后的DAPT评分和PRECISE-DAPT评分都是Gensini评分的独立危险因素(P <.001和P = .047)。此外,DAPT得分提高1分,PRECCISE-DAPT得分提高5分,导致51%(赔率[OR]:1.51,95%置信区间[CI]:1.19–1.91,P = .001)和34调整后3-VD风险增加的百分比(OR:1.34,95%CI:1.11–1.62,P = .003)。DAPT评分和PRECISE-DAPT评分均与ACS患者的冠状动脉狭窄程度独立相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号