首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Ratings of Perceived Exertion Misclassify Intensities for Sedentary Older Adults During Graded Cycling Test: Effect of Supramaximal High-Intensity Interval Training
【2h】

Ratings of Perceived Exertion Misclassify Intensities for Sedentary Older Adults During Graded Cycling Test: Effect of Supramaximal High-Intensity Interval Training

机译:久坐不动的成年人在分级骑行测试中的感知运动等级错误分类强度:超高强度高强度间歇训练的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study aims (1) to evaluate ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and corresponding intensities during a maximal graded cycling test and (2) to determine the effects of 6 weeks of supramaximal cycling exercise (SCE) intervention on RPE and associated physiological factors in young and older sedentary groups. Two healthy groups of 17 young adults [average (SD) age: 26.2 (2.4) year] and 13 older adults [average (SD) age: 54.5 (2.3) year] completed a 6-week SCE intervention on an ergocycle. Physiological values and RPE were collected across stages corresponding to ventilator thresholds 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2) of the graded cycling test and 10 min following the end of test and during the six bouts of SCE. The relative intensity for both VT1 and VT2 were also objectively calculated based on the percent of maximal heart rate %HRmax and peak oxygen consumption %V˙O2peak.Before SCE intervention, RPE values were significantly higher for the older group compared to younger at VT1 [p < 0.01] and VT2 [p < 0.01], although both groups were working at similar relative intensities (%V˙O2). After 6 weeks of SCE, the older group’s perceived effort values were normalized to the actual estimated ones and were similar to those observed in younger individuals. The intervention elicited physiological changes at rest and submaximal intensities, while no improvements were noted for both groups in aerobic fitness (i.e., V˙O2peak). For both groups, RPE decreases with SCE at 10 min following graded test correlated significantly to V˙O2 (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). Our study revealed that the initial over-estimation of the exertion levels found for the older sedentary group at the tested submaximal intensities was no longer present after 6 weeks of SCE training, therefore matching RPE values of the young group and those estimated by %HRmax and %V˙O2peak methods. Therefore, combining the RPE method with other commonly used methods of estimating exercise intensity is highly recommended for sedentary older adults to suitably monitor the exercise intensity.
机译:本研究旨在(1)评估最大分级骑行测试期间的感知劳累(RPE)等级和相应强度,以及(2)确定6周超最大骑行运动(SCE)干预对RPE和相关生理因素的影响久坐的年轻人和年轻人。由17位年轻成年人(平均(SD)年龄:26.2(2.4)岁)和13位老年成年人(平均(SD)年龄:54.5(2.3)岁)两个健康组完成了为期6周的SCE干预。在分级循环测试的呼吸机阈值1(VT1)和呼吸机阈值2(VT2)的各个阶段以及测试结束后和SCE的六次发作期间的10分钟内,收集各个阶段的生理值和RPE。 VT1和VT2的相对强度也根据最大心率%HRmax和峰值耗氧量% V ˙ O2peak。在进行SCE干预之前,RPE与VT1 [p <0.01]和VT2 [p <0.01]的年轻组相比,老年组的值显着高于年轻组,尽管两组的相对强度均相似(% V ˙ < / math> O2)。 SCE的6周后,年龄较大的组的感知到的努力值被归一化为实际的估计值,并且与年轻人中观察到的相似。干预引起了静息状态和最大强度的生理变化,而两组的有氧适应性均未见改善(即 <移动者口音=“ true”> V ˙ O2peak)。对于这两组,在分级测试后10分钟,RPE随SCE降低,与 V ˙ O2(r = 0.61,p <0.01)。我们的研究表明,在经过SCE训练6周后,不再出现在测试的亚最大强度下对久坐的久坐组发现的运动水平的最初高估,因此,与年轻组的RPE值和%HRmax和%<数学xmlns:mml =“ http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML” id =“ M5”溢出=“ scroll”> <移动器重音=“ true”> V ˙ O2peak方法。因此,强烈建议久坐的成年人将RPE方法与其他常用的估算运动强度的方法结合起来,以适当地监测运动强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号