首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INSURANCE CARE LEVEL IN COMMUNITY-LIVING ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND RELATED DEMENTIAS PATIENTS
【2h】

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INSURANCE CARE LEVEL IN COMMUNITY-LIVING ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND RELATED DEMENTIAS PATIENTS

机译:生活在社区的老年痴呆症和相关痴呆患者的保险与照护水平之间的联系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prevalence of Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementias (ADRD) is increasing as the US population ages. The objective of this analysis was to examine the association between type of care and insurance type among US community-living patients with ADRD.This was a secondary analysis of Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) 2013. Any beneficiary/proxy respondent reporting diagnosis of ADRD was included. Type of care (dependent variable) was characterized into ordinal levels as independent living, at-home living utilizing informal care, home health aide utilization, or skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay. SNF was used as predictor of long-term care (LTC) based on literature. The independent variable of interest was insurance type: Medicare FFS only, Medicare Advantage or FFS+Medigap insurance with and without LTC coverage, and Medicare+Medicaid dual-eligibles. A multivariate ordered logistic regression model was run, adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, marital status, mental disorders, functional limitations measured by activities of daily living, and overall health). 822 community-living ADRD patients were identified. Those with Medicare Advantage or FFS+Medigap utilized more informal services (odds ratio (OR) 0.46 [0.29, 0.74] versus 0.42 [0.22, 0.82] respectively). Presence of LTC insurance did not have an impact on type of care (OR: 0.91 [0.76, 1.18]), nor did being a dual-eligible; however, age greater than 75 years or considerable functional limitations were associated with greater intensity of care (OR: 2.84 [1.96, 4.13] and 6.13 [3.8, 9.9], respectively). The analysis did not account for income as a potential mediator. Given the increasing prevalence of ADRD, strategies to support informal care are needed.
机译:随着美国人口老龄化,阿尔茨海默氏病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)的患病率正在上升。该分析的目的是研究美国社区居住的ADRD患者的护理类型与保险类型之间的关联。这是2013年Medicare当前受益人调查(MCBS)的次要分析。任何报告ADRD诊断的受益人/代理人被包括在内。护理类型(因变量)的特征是按顺序划分为独立生活,利用非正式护理的在家生活,家庭保健助手的利用或熟练护理设施(SNF)的住宿。根据文献,SNF被用作长期护理(LTC)的预测指标。利益的独立变量是保险类型:仅Medicare FFS,具有或不具有LTC承保范围的Medicare Advantage或FFS + Medigap保险,以及Medicare + Medicaid双资格保险。运行了多元有序逻辑回归模型,对潜在的混杂因素(年龄,性别,婚姻状况,精神障碍,通过日常生活活动测得的功能限制和整体健康状况)进行了调整。确定了822例社区居住的ADRD患者。拥有Medicare Advantage或FFS + Medigap的人使用更多的非正式服务(赔率(OR)分别为0.46 [0.29,0.74]和0.42 [0.22,0.82])。 LTC保险的存在对护理类型没有影响(OR:0.91 [0.76,1.18]),也没有双重资格;但是,年龄大于75岁或相当大的功能限制与更高的护理强度相关(OR:分别为2.84 [1.96,4.13]和6.13 [3.8,9.9])。该分析没有考虑作为潜在调解人的收入。鉴于ADRD的患病率日益上升,需要有支持非正式护理的策略。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(2),Suppl 1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 532
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号