首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in different dose calculation grid sizes between Acuros XB and anisotropic analytical algorithm for prostate VMAT
【2h】

Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in different dose calculation grid sizes between Acuros XB and anisotropic analytical algorithm for prostate VMAT

机译:Acuros XB与前列腺VMAT各向异性分析算法之间在不同剂量计算网格大小下的剂量学和放射生物学比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To investigate feasible treatment planning parameters, we aimed to evaluate the dosimetric and radiobiological impact of the dose calculation algorithm and grid size in the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for prostate cancer. Twenty patients were selected, and the treatment plans were initially generated with anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and recalculated with Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm. Various dose grids were used for AXB (1, 2, and 3 mm) and AAA (1, 3, and 5 mm) plan. Dosimetric parameters such as homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI), and radiobiological parameters such as tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were calculated. Significant differences were observed in the planning target volume (PTV) coverage between both algorithms, and the V95%, HI, and CI of AAA were significantly affected by grid (p < 0.01). On 1 mm grid, the mean rectal dose difference between both algorithms was 2.87% of the prescription dose (p < 0.01), which was the highest among the critical organs. The TCP and NTCP of the AAA were higher than those of AXB (p < 0.01). Compared to AXB with 1 mm grid, the 2 mm grid showed comparable dose calculation accuracy with short calculation time. This study found that the PTV and rectum show significant differences according to dose calculation algorithm and grid. Considering the dose calculation performance for heterogeneous area, we recommend AXB with 2 mm grid for improving treatment efficiency of prostate VMAT.
机译:为了研究可行的治疗计划参数,我们旨在评估前列腺癌的容积调制弧光治疗(VMAT)计划中剂量计算算法和网格大小对剂量和放射生物学的影响。选择20例患者,最初使用各向异性分析算法(AAA)生成治疗计划,然后使用Acuros XB(AXB)算法重新计算。 AXB(1、2和3 mm)和AAA(1、3和5 mm)计划使用了各种剂量网格。计算剂量参数,例如均一性指数(HI)和合格指数(CI),以及放射生物学参数,例如肿瘤控制概率(TCP)和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)。两种算法之间的计划目标体积(PTV)覆盖率均存在显着差异,并且AAA的V95%,HI和CI受网格显着影响(p <0.01)。在1 mm网格上,两种算法之间的平均直肠剂量差异为处方剂量的2.87%(p <0.01),在关键器官中最高。 AAA的TCP和NTCP高于AXB(p <0.01)。与具有1 mm网格的AXB相比,2 mm网格显示了可比的剂量计算精度,且计算时间短。这项研究发现,根据剂量计算算法和网格,PTV和直肠表现出显着差异。考虑到异质区域的剂量计算性能,我们建议使用2 mm网格的AXB来提高前列腺VMAT的治疗效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号