首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluation of consensus method for the culture ofBurkholderia pseudomallei in soil samples from Laos
【2h】

Evaluation of consensus method for the culture ofBurkholderia pseudomallei in soil samples from Laos

机译:文化共识方法的评价老挝土壤样品中的伯克霍尔德菌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: We have previously shown that PCR following enrichment culture is the most sensitive method to detect Burkholderia pseudomallei in environmental samples. Here we report an evaluation of the published consensus method for the culture of B. pseudomallei from Lao soil in comparison with our conventional culture method and with PCR with or without prior broth enrichment. >Methods: One hundred soil samples were collected from a field known to contain B. pseudomallei and processed by: (i) the conventional method, (ii-iii) the consensus method using media prepared in either Laos or Thailand, and (iv) the consensus method performed in Thailand, as well as by (v) PCR following direct extraction of DNA from soil and (vi) PCR following broth pre-enrichment. >Results: The numbers of samples in which B. pseudomallei was detected were 42, 10, 7, 6, 6 and 84, respectively. However, two samples were positive by the consensus method but negative by conventional culture, and one sample was negative by PCR following enrichment although B. pseudomallei was isolated by the conventional culture method. >Conclusions/Discussion: The results show that no single method will detect all environmental samples that contain B. pseudomallei. People conducting environmental surveys for this organism should be aware of the possibility of false-negative results using the consensus culture method. An approach that entails screening using PCR after enrichment, followed by the evaluation of a range of different culture methods on PCR-positive samples to determine which works best in each setting, is recommended.
机译:>背景:我们之前已经证明,富集培养后的PCR是检测环境样品中假伯克霍尔德菌的最灵敏方法。在这里,我们报告了与我们的常规培养方法以及采用或不采用先有肉汤富集的PCR相比,从老挝土壤中培养的假芽孢杆菌的共识方法的评估。 >方法:从一个已知含有假小芽孢杆菌的田地中收集了一百份土壤样品,并通过以下方法进行处理:(i)常规方法,(ii-iii)使用在老挝或印度准备好的培养基的共识方法泰国和(iv)在泰国执行的共识方法,以及(v)从土壤中直接提取DNA后进行PCR(v)和肉汤预富集后进行(vi)PCR。 >结果:检出假疟原虫的样本数分别为42、10、7、6、6和84。然而,尽管通过常规培养方法分离出假芽孢杆菌,但通过共有方法阳性的两个样品在常规培养中为阴性,而在常规培养之后通过PCR的阴性为一个样品。 >结论/讨论:结果表明,没有一种方法能够检测到所有含有假疟原虫的环境样品。对这种生物进行环境调查的人们应该意识到使用共有培养方法产生假阴性结果的可能性。建议使用一种方法,该方法需要在富集后使用PCR进行筛选,然后评估PCR阳性样品的一系列不同培养方法,以确定哪种方法在每种情况下效果最佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号